529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15795570)
1. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail.
Utrilla AL; Reig JS; Muñoz FM; Tufanisco CB
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Apr; 19(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 15795570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.
Madsen JE; Naess L; Aune AK; Alho A; Ekeland A; Strømsøe K
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9619458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail.
Saudan M; Lübbeke A; Sadowski C; Riand N; Stern R; Hoffmeyer P
J Orthop Trauma; 2002 Jul; 16(6):386-93. PubMed ID: 12142826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients.
Hardy DC; Descamps PY; Krallis P; Fabeck L; Smets P; Bertens CL; Delince PE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 May; 80(5):618-30. PubMed ID: 9611022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A newly designed locked intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures fixation: results of the first 100 Trochanteric implantations.
Loubignac F; Chabas JF
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Apr; 95(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19345659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail.
Yaozeng X; Dechun G; Huilin Y; Guangming Z; Xianbin W
Injury; 2010 Dec; 41(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 21374904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.
Bess RJ; Jolly SA
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9322196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison.
Zehir S; Zehir R; Zehir S; Azboy İ; Haykir N
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 26037995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood loss in trochanteric fractures: multivariate analysis comparing dynamic hip screw and Gamma nail.
Ronga M; Bonzini D; Valoroso M; La Barbera G; Tamini J; Cherubino M; Cherubino P
Injury; 2017 Oct; 48 Suppl 3():S44-S47. PubMed ID: 29025609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Adams CI; Robinson CM; Court-Brown CM; McQueen MM
J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Aug; 15(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 11514765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proximal femoral nails antirotation, Gamma nails, and dynamic hip screws for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of femur: A meta-analysis.
Ma KL; Wang X; Luan FJ; Xu HT; Fang Y; Min J; Luan HX; Yang F; Zheng H; He SJ
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 100(8):859-66. PubMed ID: 25453927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of 2-Screw Implant and Antirotational Blade Implant in Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures].
FeldinszkÁ J; Jacko P; Barinka J; Kilian M; Šimko P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(4):268-272. PubMed ID: 32940222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Classic nail versus DHS. A prospective randomised study of fixation of trochanteric femur fractures].
Hoffmann R; Schmidmaier G; Schulz R; Schütz M; Südkamp NP
Unfallchirurg; 1999 Mar; 102(3):182-90. PubMed ID: 10232034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective randomized comparison between a dynamic hip screw and a mini-invasive static nail in fractures of the trochanteric area: preliminary results.
Dujardin FH; Benez C; Polle G; Alain J; Biga N; Thomine JM
J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Aug; 15(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 11514766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
