164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15795844)
1. Evaluation of the normal appendix at low-dose non-enhanced spiral CT.
Bursali A; Araç M; Oner AY; Celik H; Ekşioğlu S; Gümüş T
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2005 Mar; 11(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15795844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT.
Benjaminov O; Atri M; Hamilton P; Rappaport D
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 12409572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography.
Karabulut N; Boyaci N; Yagci B; Herek D; Kiroglu Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):732-40. PubMed ID: 17895785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of the normal appendix with low-dose unenhanced CT: use of the sliding slab averaging technique.
Joo SM; Lee KH; Kim YH; Kim SY; Kim K; Kim KJ; Kim B
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):780-7. PubMed ID: 19336669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA; McCabe CJ; Lawrason JN; Berger DL; Sacknoff R
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 8988203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Acute appendicitis in non-contrast spiral CT: a diagnostic luxury or benefit?].
Stacher R; Portugaller H; Preidler KW; Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ; Anegg U; Rabl H; Spuller E; Szolar DH
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 10464501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Unenhanced spiral CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis].
Yüksekkaya R; Akgül E; Inal M; Binokay F; Celiktaş M; Aksungur E
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Jun; 10(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15236128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective use of CT by surgeons in acute appendicitis diagnosis.
Fersahoğlu MM; Çiyiltepe H; Ergin A; Fersahoğlu AT; Esen Bulut N; Başak A; Karip B; Ağca B
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33394463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wall thickness and outer diameter of the normal appendix in adults using 64 slices multidetector CT.
Charoensak A; Pongpornsup S; Suthikeeree W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93(12):1437-42. PubMed ID: 21344807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT can reduce hospitalization for observation in children with suspected appendicitis.
Acosta R; Crain EF; Goldman HS
Pediatr Radiol; 2005 May; 35(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 15633057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study.
Coursey CA; Nelson RC; Patel MB; Cochran C; Dodd LG; Delong DM; Beam CA; Vaslef S
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 20093517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonography for appendicitis: nonvisualization of the appendix is an indication for active clinical observation rather than direct referral for computed tomography.
Stewart JK; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB
J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Oct; 40(8):455-61. PubMed ID: 22638942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visualization rate and pattern of normal appendix on multidetector computed tomography by using multiplanar reformation display.
Jan YT; Yang FS; Huang JK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 16012298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic limitations of 10 mm thickness single-slice computed tomography for patients with suspected appendicitis.
Kaidu M; Oyamatu M; Sato K; Saitou A; Yamamoto S; Yoshimura N; Sasai K
Radiat Med; 2008 Feb; 26(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 18301980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA; Mostafavi AA; McCabe CJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 9428814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pitfalls and mimickers at 64-section helical CT that cause negative appendectomy: an analysis from 1057 appendectomies.
Soyer P; Dohan A; Eveno C; Naneix AL; Pocard M; Pautrat K; Hamzi L; Duteil C; Lavergne-Slove A; Boudiaf M
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(5):895-901. PubMed ID: 23845254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT predictors of failed laparoscopic appendectomy.
Siewert B; Raptopoulos V; Liu SI; Hodin RA; Davis RB; Rosen MP
Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 14595145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.
Keyzer C; Tack D; de Maertelaer V; Bohy P; Gevenois PA; Van Gansbeke D
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):164-72. PubMed ID: 15155894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
