These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15795862)

  • 1. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in insects is associated with only limited morphological diversity.
    Eberhard W
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):657-81. PubMed ID: 16674564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation.
    Friberg U; Lew TA; Byrne PG; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1540-51. PubMed ID: 16153039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.
    Foerster K; Coulson T; Sheldon BC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1107-10. PubMed ID: 17597758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.
    Arnqvist G; Rowe L
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):787-9. PubMed ID: 11845208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimentally enforced monogamy: inadvertent selection, inbreeding, or evidence for sexually antagonistic coevolution?
    Rice WR; Holland B
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):682-5. PubMed ID: 15856709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes.
    Moore AJ; Pizzari T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S88-97. PubMed ID: 15795865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females.
    Arnqvist G; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S26-37. PubMed ID: 15795859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intersexual arms race? Genital coevolution in nephilid spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae).
    Kuntner M; Coddington JA; Schneider JM
    Evolution; 2009 Jun; 63(6):1451-63. PubMed ID: 19492993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexually antagonistic co-evolution: a model and an empirical test.
    Hoyle A; Gilburn AS
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Jan; 23(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 20002256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual conflict and antagonistic coevolution across water strider populations.
    Perry JC; Rowe L
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):544-57. PubMed ID: 22276547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The genetic architecture of sexual conflict: male harm and female resistance in Callosobruchus maculatus.
    Gay L; Brown E; Tregenza T; Pincheira-Donoso D; Eady PE; Vasudev R; Hunt J; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Feb; 24(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 21126275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.
    Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 15842486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replicator-dynamics models of sexual conflict.
    Kimura M; Ihara Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19505480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.
    Albert AY; Otto SP
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):119-21. PubMed ID: 16210543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.
    Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation.
    Garcia de Leaniz C; Fleming IA; Einum S; Verspoor E; Jordan WC; Consuegra S; Aubin-Horth N; Lajus D; Letcher BH; Youngson AF; Webb JH; Vøllestad LA; Villanueva B; Ferguson A; Quinn TP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):173-211. PubMed ID: 17437557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict.
    Gavrilets S
    Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6772):886-9. PubMed ID: 10706284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.