108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15796308)
1. Quantification of initial adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis to medical grade polymers using a DNA-based fluorescence assay.
Sénéchal A; Catuogno CJ; Tabrizian M
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2005; 16(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 15796308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Probing surface adhesion forces of Enterococcus faecalis to medical-grade polymers using atomic force microscopy.
Sénéchal A; Carrigan SD; Tabrizian M
Langmuir; 2004 May; 20(10):4172-7. PubMed ID: 15969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acceleration of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation by aggregation substance expression in an ex vivo model of cardiac valve colonization.
Chuang-Smith ON; Wells CL; Henry-Stanley MJ; Dunny GM
PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e15798. PubMed ID: 21209892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation of
Woitschach F; Kloss M; Schlodder K; Borck A; Grabow N; Reisinger EC; Sombetzki M
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2022; 12():868338. PubMed ID: 35651751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by dual functional textured and nitric oxide releasing surfaces.
Xu LC; Wo Y; Meyerhoff ME; Siedlecki CA
Acta Biomater; 2017 Mar; 51():53-65. PubMed ID: 28087484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enterococcus faecalis surface proteins determine its adhesion mechanism to bile drain materials.
Waar K; van der Mei HC; Harmsen HJM; Degener JE; Busscher HJ
Microbiology (Reading); 2002 Jun; 148(Pt 6):1863-1870. PubMed ID: 12055306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Use of atomic force microscopy to observe the surface and the dynamic forming process of biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis].
Yan Y; Xu CB; Niu WD
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 28(4):447-9, 454. PubMed ID: 20848945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planktonic Interference and Biofilm Alliance between Aggregation Substance and Endocarditis- and Biofilm-Associated Pili in Enterococcus faecalis.
Afonina I; Lim XN; Tan R; Kline KA
J Bacteriol; 2018 Dec; 200(24):. PubMed ID: 30249706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of adhesion force on croRS gene expression and antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus faecalis.
Wang X; Wang S; Yuan L; Liang Z; Zhang X; Lin D; Hu X
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2024 Jan; 112(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 37695122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cationic conjugated polymers for enhancing beneficial bacteria adhesion and biofilm formation in gut microbiota.
Zhang P; Xu C; Zhou X; Qi R; Liu L; Lv F; Li Z; Wang S
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2020 Apr; 188():110815. PubMed ID: 31986332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new textured polyphosphazene biomaterial with improved blood coagulation and microbial infection responses.
Xu LC; Li Z; Tian Z; Chen C; Allcock HR; Siedlecki CA
Acta Biomater; 2018 Feb; 67():87-98. PubMed ID: 29229544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of irrigation regimens on the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to root canal dentin.
Kishen A; Sum CP; Mathew S; Lim CT
J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):850-4. PubMed ID: 18570994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of bacterial adhesion to dental materials of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) using atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
Fang J; Wang C; Li Y; Zhao Z; Mei L
Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 26991988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cranberry derived proanthocyanidins reduce bacterial adhesion to selected biomaterials.
Eydelnant IA; Tufenkji N
Langmuir; 2008 Sep; 24(18):10273-81. PubMed ID: 18698853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adhesion of Oral Bacteria to Commercial d-PTFE Membranes: Polymer Microstructure Makes a Difference.
Begić G; Petković Didović M; Lučić Blagojević S; Jelovica Badovinac I; Žigon J; Perčić M; Cvijanović Peloza O; Gobin I
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 35328404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of culture heterogeneity in cell surface charge on adhesion and biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.
van Merode AE; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Krom BP
J Bacteriol; 2006 Apr; 188(7):2421-6. PubMed ID: 16547028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grafted glycopolymer-based receptor mimics on polymer support for selective adhesion of bacteria.
Yang Q; Strathmann M; Rumpf A; Schaule G; Ulbricht M
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2010 Dec; 2(12):3555-62. PubMed ID: 21090578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Adhesion capacity of Enterococcus faecium (SF 68) and Enterococcus faecalis to various substrates].
Chisari G; Lo Bue AM; Drago L; Abbiati R; Gismondo MR
G Ital Chemioter; 1992; 39(1-3):11-5. PubMed ID: 1365744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atomic force microscopy study on specificity and non-specificity of interaction forces between Enterococcus faecalis cells with and without aggregation substance.
Waar K; van der Mei HC; Harmsen HJM; de Vries J; Atema-Smit J; Degener JE; Busscher HJ
Microbiology (Reading); 2005 Jul; 151(Pt 7):2459-2464. PubMed ID: 16000736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentinal tubule invasion and adherence by Enterococcus faecalis.
Chivatxaranukul P; Dashper SG; Messer HH
Int Endod J; 2008 Oct; 41(10):873-82. PubMed ID: 18822013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
