These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1579680)

  • 1. [Results of the quality control of magnetic resonance images].
    Duina A; Mascaro L; Moretti R; Belletti S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Mar; 83(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 1579680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Definition criteria for a magnetic resonance quality assurance program: multicenter study].
    Mascaro L; Strocchi S; Colombo P; Del Corona M; Baldassarri AM
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):389-97. PubMed ID: 10432972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality control protocol for in vitro micro-computed tomography.
    Stoico R; Tassani S; Perilli E; Baruffaldi F; Viceconti M
    J Microsc; 2010 May; 238(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 20529063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Magnetic resonance of the elbow: technique optimization and definitions of normal anatomical features and their variations].
    Quaia E; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Moroldo ML
    Radiol Med; 1998; 95(1-2):7-15. PubMed ID: 9636720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective and objective image qualities: a comparison of sagittal T2 weighted spin-echo and Turbo-spin-echo sequences in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine by use of a subjective ranking system.
    Görres G; Mader I; Proske M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1998; 51(7):258-65. PubMed ID: 9793409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional cerebral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography at 3.0 Tesla: initial results using highly accelerated parallel acquisition.
    Nael K; Fenchel M; Salamon N; Duckwiler GR; Laub G; Finn JP; Villablanca JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Oct; 41(10):763-8. PubMed ID: 16971800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Laparoscopic and general surgery guided by open interventional magnetic resonance].
    Lauro A; Gould SW; Cirocchi R; Giustozzi G; Darzi A
    Minerva Chir; 2004 Oct; 59(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 15494679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac cine imaging at 3 Tesla: initial experience with a 32-element body-array coil.
    Fenchel M; Deshpande VS; Nael K; Finn JP; Miller S; Ruehm S; Laub G
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Aug; 41(8):601-8. PubMed ID: 16829742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
    Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac MRI: comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and conventional spin echo sequences in the morphological evaluation of the ventricles.
    Erriquez D; Di Cesare E; Barile A; Gallucci M; Splendiani A; Masciocchi C
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 11859299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality control in magnetic resonance for clinical use].
    Podo F
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1994; 30(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 7832394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical principles of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Seeger LL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Jul; (244):7-16. PubMed ID: 2663291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A quality control test of the image obtained with electronic portal imaging devices].
    Casanova Borca V; Pasquino M; Bertodatto M; Tofani S
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 11740456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic field strength increase yields significantly greater contrast-to-noise ratio increase: Measured using BOLD contrast in the primary visual area.
    Okada T; Yamada H; Ito H; Yonekura Y; Sadato N
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 15721590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Turbo STIR sequence: optimization and comparison with conventional STIR sequence in bone diseases].
    Shariat Razavi I; Amezic V; Zucconi F; Cova MA; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 1997 Jun; 93(6):662-8. PubMed ID: 9411510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion with ultrafast magnetic resonance tomography].
    Machnig T; Koroneos A; Engels G; Bachmann K; Simm C; Wilke N; Ellermann J; Zhang J; Ya X; Merkel H
    Z Kardiol; 1994 Nov; 83(11):840-50. PubMed ID: 7825374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Knee joint cartilage in magnetic resonance tomography. MR chondrovolumetry (MR-CVM) using fat-suppressed FLASH 3D sequence].
    Eckstein F; Sittek H; Gavazzeni A; Milz S; Kiefer B; Putz R; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 1995 Feb; 35(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 7740121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable?
    Buerke B; Allkemper T; Kugel H; Bremer C; Evers S; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Tombach B
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18692751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla.
    Nael K; Ruehm SG; Michaely HJ; Pope W; Laub G; Finn JP; Villablanca JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 16523022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.