BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

811 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15796963)

  • 1. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
    Huang Q; Schantz SP; Rao PH; Mo J; McCormick SA; Chaganti RS
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Aug; 28(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 10862048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alterations of chromosomal copy number during progression of diffuse-type gastric carcinomas: metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization analyses of multiple samples from individual tumours.
    Peng DF; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Tsubosa Y; Hattori T
    J Pathol; 2003 Nov; 201(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 14595756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of DNA copy number changes in microdissected serous ovarian cancer tissue using a cDNA microarray platform.
    Tsuda H; Birrer MJ; Ito YM; Ohashi Y; Lin M; Lee C; Wong WH; Rao PH; Lau CC; Berkowitz RS; Wong KK; Mok SC
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 15571795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.
    Pirker C; Raidl M; Steiner E; Elbling L; Holzmann K; Spiegl-Kreinecker S; Aubele M; Grasl-Kraupp B; Marosi C; Micksche M; Berger W
    Cytometry A; 2004 Sep; 61(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15351986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization.
    Kuukasjärvi T; Tanner M; Pennanen S; Karhu R; Visakorpi T; Isola J
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Feb; 18(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 9115969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
    Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
    Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of DOP-PCR for amplification and labeling of BAC DNA for FISH.
    Darouich S; Popovici C; Missirian C; Moncla A
    Biotech Histochem; 2012 Feb; 87(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 21314248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
    Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of comparative expressed sequence hybridization for genome-wide expression profiling at chromosome level.
    Ling ZQ; Sugihara H; Tatsuta T; Mukaisho K; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2007 Jun; 175(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 17556071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic profiling of chromosome 1 in breast cancer: mapping of regions of gains and losses and identification of candidate genes on 1q.
    Orsetti B; Nugoli M; Cervera N; Lasorsa L; Chuchana P; Rougé C; Ursule L; Nguyen C; Bibeau F; Rodriguez C; Theillet C
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Nov; 95(10):1439-47. PubMed ID: 17060936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tong CY; Hui AB; Yin XL; Pang JC; Zhu XL; Poon WS; Ng HK
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Feb; 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):187-93. PubMed ID: 14758948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-resolution analysis of genomic copy number alterations in bladder cancer by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Hurst CD; Fiegler H; Carr P; Williams S; Carter NP; Knowles MA
    Oncogene; 2004 Mar; 23(12):2250-63. PubMed ID: 14968109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones.
    Fiegler H; Carr P; Douglas EJ; Burford DC; Hunt S; Scott CE; Smith J; Vetrie D; Gorman P; Tomlinson IP; Carter NP
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Apr; 36(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 12619160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large fragment Bst DNA polymerase for whole genome amplification of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.
    Aviel-Ronen S; Qi Zhu C; Coe BP; Liu N; Watson SK; Lam WL; Tsao MS
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():312. PubMed ID: 17156491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole genome amplification and molecular genetic analysis of DNA from paraffin-embedded prostate adenocarcinoma tumor tissue.
    Kim SH; Godfrey T; Jensen RH
    J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1512-8. PubMed ID: 10492247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of genomic aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization of metaphase chromosomes.
    Carless M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 523():177-202. PubMed ID: 19381938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic alterations in microdissected prostate cancer cells by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Kim SH; Kim MS; Jensen RH
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2000 Aug; 3(2):110-114. PubMed ID: 12497108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.