These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1579759)

  • 1. A note on the effect of the intraclass correlation in the multiple reading procedure with a unanimity rule.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 1992 Jan; 11(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1579759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple reading procedures: the performance of diagnostic tests.
    Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 1988 May; 7(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 3291042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualizing the impact of prevalence on a diagnostic test.
    Rehling M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2010 Oct; 70(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 20645678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(9):981-91. PubMed ID: 9160493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The performance of the O'Brien-Fleming multiple testing procedure in the presence of intraclass correlation.
    Lui KJ
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 8086606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of operational characteristics for binary tests with clustered data.
    Kwak M; Um SW; Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2325-33. PubMed ID: 25801180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic results and their clinical interpretation--or: what you never wanted to know about diagnosis].
    Kürzl R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 53(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 8440453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Fardy JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Critical reading of articles about diagnostic tests (part II): Analyzing results].
    Moratalla Rodríguez G
    Radiologia; 2015; 57 Suppl 1():22-8. PubMed ID: 25555479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding Negative Predictive Value of Diagnostic Tests Used in Clinical Practice.
    Umberger RA; Hatfield LA; Speck PM
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2017; 36(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27902658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles.
    Weissler AM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1061-71. PubMed ID: 10560593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement Analysis: What He Said, She Said Versus You Said.
    Vetter TR; Schober P
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jun; 126(6):2123-2128. PubMed ID: 29677066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
    Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN
    J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information provided by diagnostic and screening tests: improving probabilities.
    Weatherall M
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Apr; 94(1110):230-235. PubMed ID: 29133377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.