BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15797779)

  • 1. Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing.
    Hooge IT; Over EA; van Wezel RJ; Frens MA
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1901-8. PubMed ID: 15797779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.
    Smith TJ; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):3. PubMed ID: 21205873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of previously fixated locations on saccade trajectory during free visual search.
    Sogo H; Takeda Y
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3831-44. PubMed ID: 16938331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search?
    Smith TJ; Henderson JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2384-98. PubMed ID: 21837543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Saccades and microsaccades during visual fixation, exploration, and search: foundations for a common saccadic generator.
    Otero-Millan J; Troncoso XG; Macknik SL; Serrano-Pedraza I; Martinez-Conde S
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(14):21.1-18. PubMed ID: 19146322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference.
    Theeuwes J; Godijn R
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1485-92. PubMed ID: 15066406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return.
    Dorris MC; Klein RM; Everling S; Munoz DP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 14(8):1256-63. PubMed ID: 12495530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coarse-to-fine eye movement strategy in visual search.
    Over EA; Hooge IT; Vlaskamp BN; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(17):2272-80. PubMed ID: 17617434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.
    Dodd MD; Van der Stigchel S; Hollingworth A
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Mar; 20(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 19222812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Just passing through? Inhibition of return in saccadic sequences.
    MacInnes WJ; Krüger HM; Hunt AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):402-16. PubMed ID: 25219515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microsaccadic response during inhibition of return in a target-target paradigm.
    Betta E; Galfano G; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 17087989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frontal eye field contributions to rapid corrective saccades.
    Murthy A; Ray S; Shorter SM; Priddy EG; Schall JD; Thompson KG
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 97(2):1457-69. PubMed ID: 17135479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The long and the short of it: spatial statistics at fixation vary with saccade amplitude and task.
    Tatler BW; Baddeley RJ; Vincent BT
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1857-62. PubMed ID: 16469349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A gaze-contingent paradigm for studying continuous saccadic adaptation.
    Garaas TW; Nieuwenhuis T; Pomplun M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):334-40. PubMed ID: 18096242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components.
    Hunt AR; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1068-74. PubMed ID: 14585023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of attending to multiple locations on eye movements.
    Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):1921-7. PubMed ID: 15820510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saccade preparation is required for exogenous attention but not endogenous attention or IOR.
    Smith DT; Schenk T; Rorden C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1438-47. PubMed ID: 22428677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.
    Tipper SP; Weaver B; Jerreat LM; Burak AL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Jun; 20(3):478-99. PubMed ID: 8027711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of return in static but not necessarily in dynamic search.
    Wang Z; Zhang K; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 20045881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.