244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15797908)
1. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data.
Grant GR; Liu J; Stoeckert CJ
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2684-90. PubMed ID: 15797908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
Gao X
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
Yang H; Churchill G
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
Scheid S; Spang R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A powerful approach for effective finding of significantly differentially expressed genes.
Abul O; Alhajj R; Polat F
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 17048460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting periodic patterns in unevenly spaced gene expression time series using Lomb-Scargle periodograms.
Glynn EF; Chen J; Mushegian AR
Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 16303799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using weighted permutation scores to detect differential gene expression with microarray data.
Guo X; Pan W
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Aug; 3(4):989-1006. PubMed ID: 16078371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis.
Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
Matsui S; Noma H
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
