244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15797908)
21. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD
Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A spline function approach for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
He W
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):2954-63. PubMed ID: 15180936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Increased power of microarray analysis by use of an algorithm based on a multivariate procedure.
Krohn K; Eszlinger M; Paschke R; Roeder I; Schuster E
Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(17):3530-4. PubMed ID: 15998661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. goCluster integrates statistical analysis and functional interpretation of microarray expression data.
Wrobel G; Chalmel F; Primig M
Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(17):3575-7. PubMed ID: 16020468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Degrees of differential gene expression: detecting biologically significant expression differences and estimating their magnitudes.
Bickel DR
Bioinformatics; 2004 Mar; 20(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 15033875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identification of differentially expressed genes using multi-resolution wavelet transformation analysis combined with SAM.
Wu Y; Zhang L; Liu L; Zhang Y; Yi D
Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 22906473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimation of false discovery rate using sequential permutation p-values.
Bancroft T; Du C; Nettleton D
Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23379645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bayesian variable selection for the analysis of microarray data with censored outcomes.
Sha N; Tadesse MG; Vannucci M
Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2262-8. PubMed ID: 16845144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integration of statistical inference methods and a novel control measure to improve sensitivity and specificity of data analysis in expression profiling studies.
Zang S; Guo R; Zhang L; Lu Y
J Biomed Inform; 2007 Oct; 40(5):552-60. PubMed ID: 17317331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
Qian HR; Huang S
Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments.
Higdon R; van Belle G; Kolker E
Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 18424815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
Lu X; Perkins DL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Meta-analysis based on control of false discovery rate: combining yeast ChIP-chip datasets.
Pyne S; Futcher B; Skiena S
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2516-22. PubMed ID: 16908499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identifying differentially expressed genes in meta-analysis via Bayesian model-based clustering.
Jung YY; Oh MS; Shin DW; Kang SH; Oh HS
Biom J; 2006 Jun; 48(3):435-50. PubMed ID: 16845907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
