These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798066)

  • 1. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays.
    Samei E
    Radiographics; 2005; 25(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 15798066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D; Soo MS; Walsh R; Pisano E; Kuzmiak CM; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26. PubMed ID: 17070449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.
    Samei E; Poolla A; Ulissey MJ; Lewin JM
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17434067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography.
    Hemminger BM
    J Digit Imaging; 2003 Sep; 16(3):292-305. PubMed ID: 14669064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Luminance and contrast performance of liquid crystal displays for mammographic applications.
    Samei E; Wright SL
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Oct; 3(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 15453807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of veiling glare.
    Krupinski EA; Lubin J; Roehrig H; Johnson J; Nafziger J
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 16488840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors.
    Zuley ML; Willison KM; Bonaccio E; Miller DP; Leong DL; Seifert PJ; Somerville P; Destounis S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1492-8. PubMed ID: 17114542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of lower resolution viewing devices for mammographic interpretation: implications for education and training.
    Chen Y; James JJ; Turnbull AE; Gale AG
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):3003-8. PubMed ID: 26037712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: display systems.
    Badano A
    Radiographics; 2004; 24(3):879-89. PubMed ID: 15143237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images.
    Byng JW; Critten JP; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):564-8. PubMed ID: 9114122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital mammography and computer assisted diagnosis].
    Stines J; Noël A; Lévy L; Séradour B; Heid P
    J Radiol; 2002 Apr; 83(4 Pt 2):581-90. PubMed ID: 12075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):308-19. PubMed ID: 16532935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating clinical implications of 15-mega-sub-pixel liquid-crystal display in phase-contrast mammography.
    Takane Y; Kawasumi Y; Sato M; Horie T; Ishibashi T
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Jul; 23(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 25851738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.