602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798257)
1. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation.
Sikora M; Dohm O; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4449-63. PubMed ID: 17634643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques.
El Naqa I; Kawrakow I; Fippel M; Siebers JV; Lindsay PE; Wickerhauser MV; Vicic M; Zakarian K; Kauffmann N; Deasy JO
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):909-22. PubMed ID: 15798264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations.
Reynaert N; Coghe M; De Smedt B; Paelinck L; Vanderstraeten B; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):831-46. PubMed ID: 15798258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An integrated Monte Carlo dosimetric verification system for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Yamamoto T; Mizowaki T; Miyabe Y; Takegawa H; Narita Y; Yano S; Nagata Y; Teshima T; Hiraoka M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1991-2008. PubMed ID: 17374923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance.
Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Ma CM; Li JS; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Xiong W; Qin LH; Yang J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):891-907. PubMed ID: 15798263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microionization chamber for reference dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications on OAR dosimetric errors.
Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Leal A; Roselló JV; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):959-70. PubMed ID: 15798268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose build-up behind air cavities for Co-60, 4, 6 and 8 MV. Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5937-50. PubMed ID: 17068375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
