371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798261)
1. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microionization chamber for reference dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications on OAR dosimetric errors.
Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Leal A; Roselló JV; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):959-70. PubMed ID: 15798268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Ma CM; Li JS; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Xiong W; Qin LH; Yang J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):891-907. PubMed ID: 15798263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of thoracic cancers using experimental and Monte Carlo approaches.
Jang SY; Liu HH; Wang X; Vassiliev ON; Siebers JV; Dong L; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):939-48. PubMed ID: 17011466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations.
Reynaert N; Coghe M; De Smedt B; Paelinck L; Vanderstraeten B; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):831-46. PubMed ID: 15798258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrated Monte Carlo dosimetric verification system for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Yamamoto T; Mizowaki T; Miyabe Y; Takegawa H; Narita Y; Yano S; Nagata Y; Teshima T; Hiraoka M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1991-2008. PubMed ID: 17374923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance.
Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose verification with Monte Carlo technique for prostate brachytherapy implants with (125)I sources.
Zhang H; Baker C; McKinsey R; Meigooni A
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 15922174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
