143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798262)
1. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations.
Reynaert N; Coghe M; De Smedt B; Paelinck L; Vanderstraeten B; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):831-46. PubMed ID: 15798258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neck.
Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Le QT; Findley D; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 15093926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Ma CM; Li JS; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Xiong W; Qin LH; Yang J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):891-907. PubMed ID: 15798263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques.
El Naqa I; Kawrakow I; Fippel M; Siebers JV; Lindsay PE; Wickerhauser MV; Vicic M; Zakarian K; Kauffmann N; Deasy JO
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):909-22. PubMed ID: 15798264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo treatment planning for molecular targeted radiotherapy within the MINERVA system.
Lehmann J; Hartmann Siantar C; Wessol DE; Wemple CA; Nigg D; Cogliati J; Daly T; Descalle MA; Flickinger T; Pletcher D; Denardo G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):947-58. PubMed ID: 15798267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MLC leaf width impact on the clinical dose distribution: a Monte Carlo approach.
Leal A; Sánchez-Doblado F; Arráns R; Capote R; Lagares JI; Pavón EC; Roselló J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 15275743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microionization chamber for reference dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications on OAR dosimetric errors.
Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Leal A; Roselló JV; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):959-70. PubMed ID: 15798268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical use of a commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning system for electron beams.
Cygler JE; Lochrin C; Daskalov GM; Howard M; Zohr R; Esche B; Eapen L; Grimard L; Caudrelier JM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1029-34. PubMed ID: 15798275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose heterogeneity in the target volume and intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate the dose in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Schwarz M; Alber M; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; Damen EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):561-70. PubMed ID: 15890601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can photon IMRT be improved by combination with mixed electron and photon techniques?
Mu X; Olofsson L; Karlsson M; Sjögren R; Zackrisson B
Acta Oncol; 2004; 43(8):727-35. PubMed ID: 15764217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with electrons using algorithm based energy/range selection methods.
Olofsson L; Mu X; Nill S; Oelfke U; Zackrisson B; Karlsson M
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Nov; 73(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 15542170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
