BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798266)

  • 1. Sensitivity study for CT image use in Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Verhaegen F; Devic S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 15798266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
    Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
    Jarry G; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo treatment planning: a simulation study using dual-energy CT images.
    Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 18068841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in homogeneous phantoms.
    Wieslander E; Knöös T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1533-44. PubMed ID: 16510961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
    Krieger T; Sauer OA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
    Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques.
    El Naqa I; Kawrakow I; Fippel M; Siebers JV; Lindsay PE; Wickerhauser MV; Vicic M; Zakarian K; Kauffmann N; Deasy JO
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):909-22. PubMed ID: 15798264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric verification of a Monte Carlo electron beam model for an add-on eMLC.
    Vatanen T; Traneus E; Lahtinen T
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):391-404. PubMed ID: 18184994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical use of a commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning system for electron beams.
    Cygler JE; Lochrin C; Daskalov GM; Howard M; Zohr R; Esche B; Eapen L; Grimard L; Caudrelier JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1029-34. PubMed ID: 15798275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.
    Knöös T; Wieslander E; Cozzi L; Brink C; Fogliata A; Albers D; Nyström H; Lassen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5785-807. PubMed ID: 17068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assigning nonelastic nuclear interaction cross sections to Hounsfield units for Monte Carlo treatment planning of proton beams.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15798271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations.
    Langen KM; Meeks SL; Poole DO; Wagner TH; Willoughby TR; Kupelian PA; Ruchala KJ; Haimerl J; Olivera GH
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(18):4259-76. PubMed ID: 16148392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the need to revise the arm structure in stylized anthropomorphic phantoms in lateral photon irradiation geometry.
    Lee C; Lee C; Lee JK
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):N393-402. PubMed ID: 17047258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation of a medical linear accelerator for radiotherapy use.
    Serrano B; Hachem A; Franchisseur E; Hérault J; Marcié S; Costa A; Bensadoun RJ; Barthe J; Gérard JP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):506-9. PubMed ID: 16644964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo treatment planning for molecular targeted radiotherapy within the MINERVA system.
    Lehmann J; Hartmann Siantar C; Wessol DE; Wemple CA; Nigg D; Cogliati J; Daly T; Descalle MA; Flickinger T; Pletcher D; Denardo G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):947-58. PubMed ID: 15798267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.