BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798275)

  • 1. Clinical use of a commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning system for electron beams.
    Cygler JE; Lochrin C; Daskalov GM; Howard M; Zohr R; Esche B; Eapen L; Grimard L; Caudrelier JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1029-34. PubMed ID: 15798275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo treatment planning for molecular targeted radiotherapy within the MINERVA system.
    Lehmann J; Hartmann Siantar C; Wessol DE; Wemple CA; Nigg D; Cogliati J; Daly T; Descalle MA; Flickinger T; Pletcher D; Denardo G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):947-58. PubMed ID: 15798267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in homogeneous phantoms.
    Wieslander E; Knöös T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1533-44. PubMed ID: 16510961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
    Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of electron beam obliquity on lateral buildup ratio: a Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3965-77. PubMed ID: 17664588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
    Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
    Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in clinical situations.
    Wieslander E; Knöös T
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 17222475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the first commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for electron beam treatment planning.
    Cygler JE; Daskalov GM; Chan GH; Ding GX
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 14761030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
    Treutwein M; Bogner L
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations.
    Reynaert N; Coghe M; De Smedt B; Paelinck L; Vanderstraeten B; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):831-46. PubMed ID: 15798258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of large-field electron beams to variations in a Monte Carlo accelerator model.
    Schreiber EC; Faddegon BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 15798253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of kilovoltage x-ray beams used for cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(6):1595-615. PubMed ID: 17327651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams.
    Newhauser W; Koch N; Hummel S; Ziegler M; Titt U
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(22):5229-49. PubMed ID: 16264250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
    Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
    Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ORANGE, a new, fast dose engine for radiotherapy treatment planning.
    van der Marck SC; Hogenbirk A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):517-21. PubMed ID: 16381778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.