These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798336)

  • 1. Dosimetry of soft x-rays in thin liquid layers.
    Severin E; Kronholz HL; Köhnlein W; Göhde W
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1459-67. PubMed ID: 15798336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of dose rate at the interface of cell culture medium and glass dishes by means of ESR dosimetry using thin films of alanine.
    Furre T; Bergstrand ES; Pedersen E; Koritzinsky M; Olsen DR; Hole EO; Pettersen EO
    Radiat Res; 1999 Jul; 152(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 10381844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical imaging of dose distributions in Fricke gels.
    Viti V; d'Errico F; Pacilio M; Luciani AM; Palma A; Grande S; Ranghiasci C; Adorante N; Guidoni L; Rosi A; Ranade M; de Pasquale F; Barone P; Sebastiani G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):148-50. PubMed ID: 16614085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation fields backscattered from material interfaces: I. Biological effectiveness.
    Zellmer DL; Chapman JD; Stobbe CC; Xu F; Das IJ
    Radiat Res; 1998 Oct; 150(4):406-15. PubMed ID: 9768854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of the x-ray mass energy-absorption coefficient of air using 3 keV to 10 keV synchrotron radiation.
    Büermann L; Grosswendt B; Kramer HM; Selbach HJ; Gerlach M; Hoffmann M; Krumrey M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5125-50. PubMed ID: 17019029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
    Hunter N; Muirhead CR
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose conversion factors and linear energy transfer for irradiation of thin blood layers with low-energy X rays.
    Verhaegen F; Seuntjens J
    Radiat Res; 1994 Jan; 137(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8265778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corrections to air kerma and exposure measured with free air ionisation chambers for charge of photoelectrons, Compton electrons and Auger electrons.
    Takata N; Begum A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):410-8. PubMed ID: 18397932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose imaging with gel-dosemeter layers: optical analysis and dedicated software.
    Gambarini G; Carrara M; Gay S; Tomatis S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):144-7. PubMed ID: 16891350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams.
    Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
    Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Air kerma rate constants for gamma emitters used most often in practice.
    Ninkovic MM; Raicevic JJ; Adrovic F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):247-50. PubMed ID: 16381721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological effectiveness of (12)C and (20)Ne ions with very high LET.
    Czub J; Banaś D; Błaszczyk A; Braziewicz J; Buraczewska I; Choinski J; Gorak U; Jaskoła M; Korman A; Lankoff A; Lisowska H; Lukaszek A; Szeflinski Z; Wojcik A
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Oct; 84(10):821-9. PubMed ID: 18979317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oxidation yield of the ferrous ion in a Fricke solution irradiated with monochromatic synchrotron soft X-rays in the 1.8-10 keV region.
    Watanabe R; Usami N; Kobayashi K
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1995 Aug; 68(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 7658136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tenth value layers for 60Co gamma rays and for 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV x rays in concrete for beams of cone angles between 0 degrees and 14 degrees calculated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Jaradat AK; Biggs PJ
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 17429304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose rate dependence of the relative biological effectiveness of 103Pd for continuous low dose rate irradiation of BA1112 rhabdomyosarcoma cells in vitro relative to acute exposures.
    Nath R; Bongiorni P; Chen Z; Gragnano J; Rockwell S
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 Sep; 81(9):689-99. PubMed ID: 16368647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterisation of a setup for mixed beam exposures of cells to 241Am alpha particles and X-rays.
    Staaf E; Brehwens K; Haghdoost S; Pachnerová-Brabcová K; Czub J; Braziewicz J; Nievaart S; Wojcik A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Sep; 151(3):570-9. PubMed ID: 22434924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose estimation of a soft X-ray exposure incident.
    Suzuki T; Matsumoto M; Kim E; Yajima K; Akashi M; Fujimoto K
    Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2 Suppl):S35-8. PubMed ID: 16823270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.