These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798346)

  • 1. The use of detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in evaluating the performance of gamma camera systems.
    Starck SA; Båth M; Carlsson S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1601-9. PubMed ID: 15798346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of gamma camera systems: a Monte Carlo study.
    Eriksson I; Starck SA; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):219-27. PubMed ID: 20172935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo simulation of intrinsic count rate performance of a scintillation camera for diagnostic images.
    Mowlavi AA; de Denaro M; Fornasier MR; Binesh A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006 Mar; 64(3):390-5. PubMed ID: 16343910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of imaging performance of a taper optics CCD; FReLoN' camera designed for medical imaging.
    Coan P; Peterzol A; Fiedler S; Ponchut C; Labiche JC; Bravin A
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2006 May; 13(Pt 3):260-70. PubMed ID: 16645252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-scale algorithm for improved scintillation detection in a CCD-based gamma camera.
    Korevaar MA; Heemskerk JW; Goorden MC; Beekman FJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):831-42. PubMed ID: 19141886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of gamma (Anger) camera systems in terms of detective quantum efficiency using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Eriksson I; Starck SÅ; Båth M
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Apr; 35(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 24300378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental determination of the extrinsic sensitivity and counting efficiency of a nuclear gamma camera using a homogeneous circular planar source.
    Rodrigues M; Galiano E
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Jan; 65(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 16914321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Front-illuminated versus back-illuminated photon-counting CCD-based gamma camera: important consequences for spatial resolution and energy resolution.
    Heemskerk JW; Westra AH; Linotte PM; Ligtvoet KM; Zbijewski W; Beekman FJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):N149-62. PubMed ID: 17404450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance evaluation of a modular gamma camera using a detectability index.
    Sain JD; Barrett HH
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 12515877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrinsic uniformity requirements for pinhole SPECT.
    Seret A; Bleeser F
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Mar; 34(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 16517968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the imaged-object distance with a stationary high-spatial-resolution scintillation camera.
    Uzunov N; Bello M; Boccaccio P; Moschini G; Bollini D; de Notaristefani F
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):N199-204. PubMed ID: 16625030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of accuracy in activity calculations for the conjugate view method from Monte Carlo simulated scintillation camera images using experimental data in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Jönsson L; Ljungberg M; Strand SE
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1679-86. PubMed ID: 16204718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.