These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798477)

  • 1. The comparison of overnight lens modalities (COLM) study.
    Ritchey ER; Barr JT; Mitchell GL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2005 Mar; 31(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 15798477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vision-Specific Quality of Life: Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis Versus Overnight Contact Lens Wear.
    González-Pérez J; Sánchez García Á; Villa-Collar C
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jan; 45(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 30048340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial.
    Lipson MJ; Sugar A; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):886-91. PubMed ID: 16276320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life.
    Berntsen DA; Mitchell GL; Barr JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 83(6):354-9. PubMed ID: 16772893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction of myopia from corneal refractive therapy.
    Sorbara L; Fonn D; Simpson T; Lu F; Kort R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 15976589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes.
    Nichols JJ; Twa MD; Mitchell GL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):2313-8. PubMed ID: 16473223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of the impact of refractive surgery on quality of life using the NEI-RQL (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life) instrument].
    Nunes LM; Schor P
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2005; 68(6):789-96. PubMed ID: 17344981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.
    Hays RD; Mangione CM; Ellwein L; Lindblad AS; Spritzer KL; McDonnell PJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2292-301. PubMed ID: 14644710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual performance after overnight orthokeratology.
    Johnson KL; Carney LG; Mountford JA; Collins MJ; Cluff S; Collins PK
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17215162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments.
    Nichols JJ; Mitchell GL; Saracino M; Zadnik K
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 121(9):1289-96. PubMed ID: 12963612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Children's Overnight Orthokeratology Investigation (COOKI) pilot study.
    Walline JJ; Rah MJ; Jones LA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 15201713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft daily wear: a visual quality of life study (interim results).
    Lipson MJ; Sugar A; Musch DC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Oct; 30(4):214-7; discussion 218. PubMed ID: 15499252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of the refractive status and vision profile survey in a contact lens clinical trial.
    Nichols JJ; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Jun; 108(6):1160-6. PubMed ID: 11382647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error.
    McDonnell PJ; Mangione C; Lee P; Lindblad AS; Spritzer KL; Berry S; Hays RD
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2302-9. PubMed ID: 14644711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes with laser refractive surgery performed by surgeons in training.
    Nehls SM; Ghoghawala SY; Hwang FS; Azari AA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1131-8. PubMed ID: 24957433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between the treatment zone diameter and visual, optical and subjective performance in Corneal Refractive Therapy lens wearers.
    Lu F; Simpson T; Sorbara L; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 17956362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual function and change in quality of life after bilateral refractive lens exchange with the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens.
    Blaylock JF; Si Z; Aitchison S; Prescott C
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 24(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 18416261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Cillino G; Casuccio A; Pasti M; Bono V; Mencucci R; Cillino S
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 23953097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of reverse-geometry lens designs for overnight orthokeratology.
    Tahhan N; Du Toit R; Papas E; Chung H; La Hood D; Holden AB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 14688542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.