These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15798825)

  • 21. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
    Tjan AH; Li T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Three Immersion Chemical Disinfectants on Clinically Derived Poly(Vinyl Siloxane) Impressions.
    Jeyapalan V; Krishnan CS; Ramasubramanian H; Sampathkumar J; Azhagarasan NS; Krishnan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):469-475. PubMed ID: 27385390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
    Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Influence of autoclave sterilization on dimensional stability and detail reproduction of 5 additional silicone impression materials].
    Xu TK; Sun ZH; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 22800674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional change of impressions on sterilization.
    Chia WK; Stevens L; Basford KE; Randell DM
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Feb; 35(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2108657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials following disinfection.
    Langenwalter EM; Aquilino SA; Turner KA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 2106580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wettability, imbibition, and mass change of disinfected low-viscosity impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC; Stroh GS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 12426496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B; Heath JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
    Corso M; Abanomy A; Di Canzio J; Zurakowski D; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of the fit of metal-ceramic restorations made with an autoclaved silicone-based impression material.
    Kollefrath R; Savary M; Schwela J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E063-70. PubMed ID: 20953566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface characteristics of polyether and addition silicone impression materials after long-term disinfection.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Aug; 74(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 8537927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.