BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15799757)

  • 1. Bacterial vaginosis--a laboratory and clinical diagnostics enigma.
    Forsum U; Hallén A; Larsson PG
    APMIS; 2005 Mar; 113(3):153-61. PubMed ID: 15799757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of microscopy methods for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
    Mota A; Prieto E; Carnall V; Exposto F
    Acta Med Port; 2000; 13(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 11026143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a point-of-care test, BVBlue, and clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
    Bradshaw CS; Morton AN; Garland SM; Horvath LB; Kuzevska I; Fairley CK
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 43(3):1304-8. PubMed ID: 15750100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of Nugent and Amsel criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
    Navarrete P; Domínguez M; Castro E; Zemelman R
    Rev Med Chil; 2000 Jul; 128(7):767-71. PubMed ID: 11050838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by human immunodeficiency virus infection status.
    Gallo MF; Jamieson DJ; Cu-Uvin S; Rompalo A; Klein RS; Sobel JD
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Apr; 38(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 21042232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis with endometrial microbial colonization and plasma cell endometritis in nonpregnant women.
    Andrews WW; Hauth JC; Cliver SP; Conner MG; Goldenberg RL; Goepfert AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 195(6):1611-6. PubMed ID: 16769017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a novel diagnostic test for bacterial vaginosis: 'the electronic nose'.
    Hay P; Tummon A; Ogunfile M; Adebiyi A; Adefowora A
    Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Feb; 14(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 12662390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture and two CE-IVD marked quantitative real-time PCRs with microbiota analysis for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
    van den Munckhof EHA; van Sitter RL; Boers KE; Lamont RF; Te Witt R; le Cessie S; Knetsch CW; van Doorn LJ; Quint WGV; Molijn A; Leverstein-van Hall MA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 May; 38(5):959-966. PubMed ID: 30903536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Nugent and Spiegel criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Analysis of discordant specimens by the Ison and Hay method].
    Martínez MA; Ovalle A; Gaete AM; Lillo E; de la Fuente F; Araneda F; Villaseca R; Salinas H
    Rev Med Chil; 2011 Jan; 139(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 21526319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis on self-collected vaginal tampon specimens.
    Sturm PD; Moodley P; Nzimande G; Balkistan R; Connolly C; Sturm AW
    Int J STD AIDS; 2002 Aug; 13(8):559-63. PubMed ID: 12194740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in the pregnant patient in an acute care setting.
    Rouse AG; Gil KM; Davis K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 279(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 18758800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the use of Pap-stained vaginal smears for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
    Eriksson K; Forsum U; Bjørnerem A; Platz-Christensen JJ; Larsson PG
    APMIS; 2007 Jul; 115(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 17614847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosis and prevalence of bacterial vaginosis.
    Saharan SP; Surve C; Raut V; Bhattacharya M
    J Postgrad Med; 1993; 39(2):72-3. PubMed ID: 8169866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency and diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
    Luni Y; Munim S; Qureshi R; Tareen AL
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):270-2. PubMed ID: 15907235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of standard methods for diagnosing vaginitis: HIV infection does not complicate the diagnosis of vaginitis.
    Sha BE; Gawel SH; Hershow RC; Passaro D; Augenbraun M; Darragh TM; Stek A; Golub ET; Mph LC; Moxley MD; Weber KM; Watts DH
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):240-50. PubMed ID: 17917568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of interpretation of gram-stained vaginal smears by Nugent's scoring system for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
    Zarakolu P; Sahin Hodoglugil NN; Aydin F; Tosun I; Gozalan A; Unal S
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Feb; 48(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 14972374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic value of Amsel's clinical criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
    Mohammadzadeh F; Dolatian M; Jorjani M; Alavi Majd H
    Glob J Health Sci; 2014 Oct; 7(3):8-14. PubMed ID: 25948431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis.
    Menard JP; Fenollar F; Henry M; Bretelle F; Raoult D
    Clin Infect Dis; 2008 Jul; 47(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18513147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of Nugent scoring method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
    Mohanty S; Sood S; Kapil A; Mittal S
    Indian J Med Res; 2010 Jan; 131():88-91. PubMed ID: 20167979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of modified diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis at peripheral health centres in developing countries.
    Mittal V; Jain A; Pradeep Y
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2012 May; 6(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 22610702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.