537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15799940)
1. New flexible polymeric heart valve prostheses for the mitral and aortic positions.
Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Franke A; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(5):E525-32. PubMed ID: 15799940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel "biomechanical" polymeric valve prostheses with special design for aortic and mitral position: a future option for pediatric patients?
Sachweh JS; Daebritz SH
ASAIO J; 2006; 52(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 16966862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position.
Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-vivo experience with the Triflo trileaflet mechanical heart valve.
Gallegos RP; Rivard AL; Suwan PT; Black S; Bertog S; Steinseifer U; Armien A; Lahti M; Bianco RW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Nov; 15(6):791-9. PubMed ID: 17152787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for mitral position.
Daebritz SH; Sachweh JS; Hermanns B; Fausten B; Franke A; Groetzner J; Klosterhalfen B; Messmer BJ
Circulation; 2003 Sep; 108 Suppl 1():II134-9. PubMed ID: 12970222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
Horstkotte D
Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early hemodynamic results of the Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic bioprostheses.
Cattaneo P; Bruno VD; Mariscalco G; Marchetti P; Ferrarese S; Salerno-Uriarte J; Sala A
J Card Surg; 2007; 22(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 17803572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current heart valve prostheses.
Lefrak EA; Starr A
Am Fam Physician; 1979 Sep; 20(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 474371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac valve replacement. Problems solved and unsolved.
Borst HG; Papagiannakis N; Bedderman C; Oelert H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Apr; 27(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 451983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the design and dynamics of aortic bioprostheses in vivo.
Thubrikar M; Skinner JR; Aouad J; Finkelmeier BA; Nolan SP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Aug; 84(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 7098513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Degenerative pathologic findings after long-term implantation of bovine pericardial bioprosthetic heart valves.
Nistal F; García-Martínez V; Fernández D; Artiñano E; Mazorra F; Gallo I
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Oct; 96(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 3172811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
