BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15800204)

  • 1. Analysis of host response to bacterial infection using error model based gene expression microarray experiments.
    Stekel DJ; Sarti D; Trevino V; Zhang L; Salmon M; Buckley CD; Stevens M; Pallen MJ; Penn C; Falciani F
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Mar; 33(6):e53. PubMed ID: 15800204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles.
    Ng SK; McLachlan GJ; Wang K; Ben-Tovim Jones L; Ng SW
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16675467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EVE (external variance estimation) increases statistical power for detecting differentially expressed genes.
    Wille A; Gruissem W; Bühlmann P; Hennig L
    Plant J; 2007 Nov; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 17680783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.
    Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite mixture model analysis of microarray expression data on samples of uncertain biological type with application to reproductive efficiency.
    Bing N; Hoeschele I; Ye K; Eilertsen KJ
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2005 May; 105(3-4):187-96. PubMed ID: 15808300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Powers of multiple-testing procedures for identification of genes significantly differentially expressed in microarray experiments.
    Tan YD; Yan HM
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 33(12):1132-40. PubMed ID: 17185174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel statistical framework to identify differentially expressed genes allowing transcriptomic background differences.
    Ling ZQ; Wang Y; Mukaisho K; Hattori T; Tatsuta T; Ge MH; Jin L; Mao WM; Sugihara H
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 20400756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
    Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
    Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of missing value imputation on detection of differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
    Scheel I; Aldrin M; Glad IK; Sørum R; Lyng H; Frigessi A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4272-9. PubMed ID: 16216830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Wang Y; Barbacioru C; Hyland F; Xiao W; Hunkapiller KL; Blake J; Chan F; Gonzalez C; Zhang L; Samaha RR
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Mar; 7():59. PubMed ID: 16551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data-adaptive test statistics for microarray data.
    Mukherjee S; Roberts SJ; van der Laan MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():ii108-14. PubMed ID: 16204088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of differential gene expression for microarray data using recursive random forest.
    Wu XY; Wu ZY; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(24):2492-6. PubMed ID: 19187584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Including probe-level measurement error in robust mixture clustering of replicated microarray gene expression.
    Liu X; Rattray M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article42. PubMed ID: 21194414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining multiple microarrays in the presence of controlling variables.
    Park T; Yi SG; Shin YK; Lee S
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1682-9. PubMed ID: 16705015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model selection in a global analysis of a microarray experiment.
    Díaz C; Moreno-Sánchez N; Rueda J; Reverter A; Wang YH; Carabaño MJ
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 18849384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploiting sample variability to enhance multivariate analysis of microarray data.
    Möller-Levet CS; West CM; Miller CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(20):2733-40. PubMed ID: 17827205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening of target-specific stress-responsive genes for the development of cell-based biosensors using a DNA microarray.
    Kim BC; Youn CH; Ahn JM; Gu MB
    Anal Chem; 2005 Dec; 77(24):8020-6. PubMed ID: 16351151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.