These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15800271)
1. Substantial overestimation of standard errors of relative survival rates of cancer patients. Brenner H; Hakulinen T Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 161(8):781-6. PubMed ID: 15800271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of period analysis for providing more up-to-date estimates of long-term survival rates: empirical evaluation among 370,000 cancer patients in Finland. Brenner H; Söderman B; Hakulinen T Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):456-62. PubMed ID: 11980816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Up-to-date and precise estimates of cancer patient survival: model-based period analysis. Brenner H; Hakulinen T Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16840519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction in selective under-ascertainment bias in population-based estimates of cancer patient survival by age adjustment. Brenner H; Hakulinen T Eur J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 41(12):1788-93. PubMed ID: 16043349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An alternative approach to age adjustment of cancer survival rates. Brenner H; Arndt V; Gefeller O; Hakulinen T Eur J Cancer; 2004 Oct; 40(15):2317-22. PubMed ID: 15454258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to interpret the relative survival ratios of cancer patients. Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T Eur J Cancer; 2008 Nov; 44(17):2661-7. PubMed ID: 18819791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Up-to-date estimates of cancer patient survival even with common latency in cancer registration. Brenner H; Hakulinen T Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1727-32. PubMed ID: 16985036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Period estimates of cancer patient survival are more up-to-date than complete estimates even at comparable levels of precision. Brenner H; Hakulinen T J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 16713519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Greenwood formula for standard error of the age-standardised relative survival ratio. Pokhrel A; Dyba T; Hakulinen T Eur J Cancer; 2008 Feb; 44(3):441-7. PubMed ID: 18053707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Survival chances of Hungarian cancer patients in the National Cancer Registry]. Tusnády G; Gaudi I; Rejto L; Kásler M; Szentirmay Z Magy Onkol; 2008 Dec; 52(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 19068461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximizing the benefits of model-based period analysis of cancer patient survival. Brenner H; Hakulinen T Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1675-81. PubMed ID: 17684145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Up-to-date long-term survival of cancer patients: an evaluation of period analysis on Swedish Cancer Registry data. Talbäck M; Stenbeck M; Rosén M Eur J Cancer; 2004 Jun; 40(9):1361-72. PubMed ID: 15177496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term survival expectations of cancer patients in Europe in 2000-2002. Brenner H; Francisci S; de Angelis R; Marcos-Gragera R; Verdecchia A; Gatta G; Allemani C; Ciccolallo L; Coleman M; Sant M; Eur J Cancer; 2009 Apr; 45(6):1028-41. PubMed ID: 19091549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation. Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates. Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimates of long-term survival for newly diagnosed cancer patients: a projection approach. Mariotto AB; Wesley MN; Cronin KA; Johnson KA; Feuer EJ Cancer; 2006 May; 106(9):2039-50. PubMed ID: 16572414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standard errors of non-standardised and age-standardised relative survival of cancer patients. Jansen L; Hakulinen T; Brenner H Br J Cancer; 2012 Jan; 106(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 22173672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity and the interpretation of treatment effect estimates from risk adjustment and instrumental variable methods. Brooks JM; Chrischilles EA Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S123-30. PubMed ID: 17909370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing equality of relative survival patterns based on aggregated data. Hakulinen T; Tenkanen L; Abeywickrama K; Päivärinta L Biometrics; 1987 Jun; 43(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 3607203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methods for calculating relative survival in population-based studies. Rutherford MJ; Dickman PW; Lambert PC Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21840284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]