These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15800301)

  • 1. A new logistic regression approach for the evaluation of diagnostic test results.
    Janssens AC; Deng Y; Borsboom GJ; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD; Steyerberg EW
    Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 15800301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of logistic regression to the analysis of diagnostic data: exact modeling of a probability tree of multiple binary variables.
    Knottnerus JA
    Med Decis Making; 1992; 12(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 1573985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic testing and the average absolute likelihood ratio: application to diagnosing wide QRS complex tachycardia and other ED diseases.
    Marill KA
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 30(9):1895-906. PubMed ID: 22858576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios.
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Mar; 31(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9506499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Cohen R; Korevaar DA; Khoshnood B; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25441698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drop the Likelihood Ratio. A Novel Non-electronic Tool for Interpreting Diagnostic Test Results.
    Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hellmich M
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 25609360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bridging the gap between clinical practice and diagnostic clinical epidemiology: pilot experiences with a didactic model based on a logarithmic scale.
    Van den Ende J; Bisoffi Z; Van Puymbroek H; Van der Stuyft P; Van Gompel A; Derese A; Lynen L; Moreira J; Janssen PA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 17518802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical methods in epidemiology. VIII. On the use of likelihood ratios for diagnostic testing with an application to general practice.
    Rigby AS; Summerton N
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(9):475-80. PubMed ID: 16040551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood ratio estimation without a gold standard: a case study evaluating a brucellosis c-ELISA in cattle and water buffalo of Trinidad.
    Fosgate GT; Adesiyun AA; Hird DW; Hietala SK
    Prev Vet Med; 2006 Aug; 75(3-4):189-205. PubMed ID: 16600408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic utility of Wada Memory Asymmetries: sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio characterization.
    Loring DW; Bowden SC; Lee GP; Meador KJ
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Nov; 23(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 19899827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian goodness of fit test and semiparametric generalization of logistic regression with measurement data.
    Schörgendorfer A; Branscum AJ; Hanson TE
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):508-19. PubMed ID: 23489010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
    Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles.
    Weissler AM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1061-71. PubMed ID: 10560593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder?
    Simel DL; Samsa GP; Matchar DB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Jan; 46(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 8433118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New patient-oriented diagnostic test characteristics analogous to the likelihood ratios conveyed information on trustworthiness.
    Linn S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15845331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and bayes' theorem in assessing diagnostic probabilities: a clinical example.
    Moons KG; van Es GA; Deckers JW; Habbema JD; Grobbee DE
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jan; 8(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 9116087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
    Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Redundancy of single diagnostic test evaluation.
    Moons KG; van Es GA; Michel BC; Büller HR; Habbema JD; Grobbee DE
    Epidemiology; 1999 May; 10(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 10230838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mathematical tools for demonstrating the clinical usefulness of biochemical markers.
    Boyd JC
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1997; 227():46-63. PubMed ID: 9127468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.