125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15800348)
1. Overestimation of lung cancer mortality in a computed tomography-screened population.
Grannis FW
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(10):2439-40; author reply 2440-1. PubMed ID: 15800348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tar-nished reputations.
Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):401. PubMed ID: 18452846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in a high-risk population: update on current status.
Russo P; Paleari L; Granone P; Cesario A; Pastorino U
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jul; 100(14):1043-4. PubMed ID: 18612133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lung cancer screening trial financed by tobacco-funded foundation, sparks debate.
Twombly R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):690-1. PubMed ID: 18477793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimate of lung cancer mortality from low-dose spiral computed tomography screening trials: implications for current mass screening recommendations.
Patz EF; Swensen SJ; Herndon JE
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jun; 22(11):2202-6. PubMed ID: 15169809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer.
Chirikos TN; Hazelton T; Tockman M; Clark R
JAMA; 2003 May; 289(18):2358; author reply 2358-9. PubMed ID: 12746351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer.
Reich J
JAMA; 2003 May; 289(18):2357; author reply 2358-9. PubMed ID: 12746349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer.
Petty TL
JAMA; 2003 May; 289(18):2357; author reply 2358-9. PubMed ID: 12746350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A defence of the New York Early Lung Cancer Project.
Henschke CI
Lancet; 2003 Mar; 361(9363):1138. PubMed ID: 12672353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [More cases discovered, but mortality not reduced. What is the value of CT screening in bronchial carcinoma?].
MMW Fortschr Med; 2011 Jan; 153(4):16. PubMed ID: 22165608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Limitations of screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography.
Jett JR
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Jul; 11(13 Pt 2):4988s-4992s. PubMed ID: 16000601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tobacco money: up in smoke?
Mulshine JL; Smith RA; Field JK; Hirsch FR
Lancet; 2002 Dec; 360(9349):1979-80; author reply 1981. PubMed ID: 12493299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical computed tomography has a role in the screening of lung cancer--the con argument.
Davidson W
Can Respir J; 2004 Apr; 11(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 15124041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical integrity up in smoke? Conflicts of interest and the lung cancer screening controversy.
Moy B
Oncologist; 2008 May; 13(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 18515732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lung cancer screening: an update.
Marcus PM
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Sep; 19(18 Suppl):83S-86S. PubMed ID: 11560979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is screening for lung cancer using low dose spiral CT scanning worthwhile?
Gleeson FV
Thorax; 2006 Jan; 61(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 16396951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-slice/helical computed tomography for lung cancer screening.
Banerjee S
Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2003 Jun; (48):1-4. PubMed ID: 12812212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential conflict of interest.
Grannis FW
Lung Cancer; 2002 Oct; 38(1):103-4; discussion 105. PubMed ID: 12367803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improbable estimate of lung cancer mortality from screening trials.
Tockman MS
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Mar; 23(9):2106-7; author reply 2107-8. PubMed ID: 15774802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
