These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15800926)

  • 1. A paracrine signal mediates the cell transformation response to low dose gamma radiation in JB6 cells.
    Weber TJ; Siegel RW; Markillie LM; Chrisler WB; Lei XC; Colburn NH
    Mol Carcinog; 2005 May; 43(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15800926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulation of the low-dose radiation paracrine-specific anchorage-independent growth response by annexin A2.
    Weber TJ; Opresko LK; Waisman DM; Newton GJ; Quesenberry RD; Bollinger N; Moore RJ; Smith RD
    Radiat Res; 2009 Jul; 172(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19580511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bystander cell proliferation is modulated by the number of adjacent cells that were exposed to ionizing radiation.
    Gerashchenko BI; Howell RW
    Cytometry A; 2005 Jul; 66(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 15915508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 cells.
    Azzam EI; de Toledo SM; Raaphorst GP; Mitchel RE
    Radiat Res; 1996 Oct; 146(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 8927708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biophysical model of the radiation-induced bystander effect.
    Nikjoo H; Khvostunov IK
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Jan; 79(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 12556330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medium-mediated intercellular communication is involved in bystander responses of X-ray-irradiated normal human fibroblasts.
    Yang H; Asaad N; Held KD
    Oncogene; 2005 Mar; 24(12):2096-103. PubMed ID: 15688009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low doses of very low-dose-rate low-LET radiation suppress radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro and induce an adaptive response.
    Elmore E; Lao XY; Kapadia R; Giedzinski E; Limoli C; Redpath JL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Mar; 169(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 18302492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low doses of diagnostic energy X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro.
    Redpath JL; Lu Q; Lao X; Molloi S; Elmore E
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Apr; 79(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 12775447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of an adaptive response against spontaneous neoplastic transformation in vitro by low-dose gamma radiation.
    Redpath JL; Antoniono RJ
    Radiat Res; 1998 May; 149(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 9588363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isoform-specific activation of protein kinase c in irradiated human fibroblasts and their bystander cells.
    Baskar R; Balajee AS; Geard CR; Hande MP
    Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2008; 40(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 17709275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cellular dichotomy between anchorage-independent growth responses to bFGF and TPA reflects molecular switch in commitment to carcinogenesis.
    Waters KM; Tan R; Opresko LK; Quesenberry RD; Bandyopadhyay S; Chrisler WB; Weber TJ
    Mol Carcinog; 2009 Nov; 48(11):1059-69. PubMed ID: 19526458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Manifestation of the adaptive response and bystander-effect of C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts irradiated by protons and gamma-rays].
    Voskanian KSh; Mitsyn GV; GaevskiÄ­ VN
    Aviakosm Ekolog Med; 2009; 43(6):23-8. PubMed ID: 20169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation-induced adaptive response in fish cell lines.
    Ryan LA; Seymour CB; O'Neill-Mehlenbacher A; Mothersill CE
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Apr; 99(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 18054128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitochondrial DNA point mutations and a novel deletion induced by direct low-LET radiation and by medium from irradiated cells.
    Murphy JE; Nugent S; Seymour C; Mothersill C
    Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 585(1-2):127-36. PubMed ID: 16002327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation-induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells.
    Azzam EI; Raaphorst GP; Mitchel RE
    Radiat Res; 1994 Apr; 138(1 Suppl):S28-31. PubMed ID: 8146320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of ionizing radiation: role of adaptive response and bystander effects.
    Ko M; Lao XY; Kapadia R; Elmore E; Redpath JL
    Mutat Res; 2006 May; 597(1-2):11-7. PubMed ID: 16414089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence suggesting that the dose-response relationship for radiation-induced transformation in vitro is due to the degree of initiation in individual cells.
    Kennedy AR
    Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 9303073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Targeted and nontargeted effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on delayed genomic instability in human cells.
    Huang L; Kim PM; Nickoloff JA; Morgan WF
    Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 67(3):1099-104. PubMed ID: 17283143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms of suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.
    Pant MC; Liao XY; Lu Q; Molloi S; Elmore E; Redpath JL
    Carcinogenesis; 2003 Dec; 24(12):1961-5. PubMed ID: 14514653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oxidative stress as a significant factor for development of an adaptive response in irradiated and nonirradiated human lymphocytes after inducing the bystander effect by low-dose X-radiation.
    Ermakov AV; Konkova MS; Kostyuk SV; Egolina NA; Efremova LV; Veiko NN
    Mutat Res; 2009 Oct; 669(1-2):155-61. PubMed ID: 19540246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.