These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15801601)

  • 21. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A review of publication bias in the gastroenterology literature.
    Heavener T; Vassar M
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 37(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 29488081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Review articles and publication bias.
    Kleijnen J; Knipschild P
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1992 May; 42(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 1388359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prevalence of Publication Bias Tests in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Chow JC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 61(12):3055-3063. PubMed ID: 30458500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications.
    Senior AM; Grueber CE; Kamiya T; Lagisz M; O'Dwyer K; Santos ES; Nakagawa S
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 27912008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Du H; Liu F; Wang L
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
    Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias.
    Cuijpers P; Smit F; Bohlmeijer E; Hollon SD; Andersson G
    Br J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 196(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 20194536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
    Timmer A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
    Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity.
    Begg CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):865-6. PubMed ID: 16085189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A parsimonious weight function for modeling publication bias.
    Citkowicz M; Vevea JL
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 28252998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutions.
    Schuit E; Roes KC; Mol BW; Kwee A; Moons KG; Groenwold RH
    Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 4():57. PubMed ID: 25908184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies.
    Copas J; Jackson D
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 15032784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
    Chuard PJC; Vrtílek M; Head ML; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000127. PubMed ID: 30682013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Footprint of publication selection bias on meta-analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics.
    Bartoš F; Maier M; Wagenmakers EJ; Nippold F; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA; Otte WM; Sladekova M; Deresssa TK; Bruns SB; Fanelli D; Stanley TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):500-511. PubMed ID: 38327122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.