656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15801999)
1. Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention in the US and UK.
Guest JF; Ruiz FJ
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15801999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of exuding venous leg ulcers in Germany and the USA.
Guest JF; Ruiz FJ; Mihai A; Lehman A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15881478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a hydration response technology dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the UK.
Walzer S; Dröschel D; Vollmer L; Atkin L; Ousey K
J Wound Care; 2018 Mar; 27(3):166-172. PubMed ID: 29509113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice?
Dinah F; Adhikari A
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Jan; 88(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 16460637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost-effectiveness of wound management protocols of care.
Harding K; Cutting K; Price P
Br J Nurs; 2000 Oct; 9(19 Suppl):S6, S8, S10 passim. PubMed ID: 12271239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation comparing the efficacy of aquacel Ag with vaseline gauze versus 1% silver sulfadiazine cream in toxic epidermal necrolysis.
Huang SH; Lin CH; Chang KP; Wu SH; Lin SD; Lai CS; Ou SF; Lee SS
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 May; 27(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 24732124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of occlusive hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional gauze dressing regarding the healing effect after abdominal operations: randomized controlled trial.
Shinohara T; Yamashita Y; Satoh K; Mikami K; Yamauchi Y; Hoshino S; Noritomi A; Maekawa T
Asian J Surg; 2008 Jan; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18334461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open surgical wounds: how does Aquacel compare with wet-to-dry gauze?
Cohn SM; Lopez PP; Brown M; Namias N; Jackowski J; Li P; Mishkin D; Lopez JM;
J Wound Care; 2004 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 14969020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why gauze dressings should not be the first choice to manage most acute surgical cavity wounds.
Bethell E
J Wound Care; 2003 Jun; 12(6):237-9. PubMed ID: 12838602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomised controlled trial of nanocrystalline silver dressing versus plain gauze as the initial post-debridement management of military wounds on wound microbiology and healing.
Fries CA; Ayalew Y; Penn-Barwell JG; Porter K; Jeffery SL; Midwinter MJ
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1111-6. PubMed ID: 24485549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moist wound healing compared with standard care of treatment of primary closed vascular surgical wounds: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Vogt KC; Uhlyarik M; Schroeder TV
Wound Repair Regen; 2007; 15(5):624-7. PubMed ID: 17971007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of absorbent dressings in the treatment of highly exuding VLUs.
Panca M; Cutting K; Guest JF
J Wound Care; 2013 Mar; 22(3):109-10, 112-8. PubMed ID: 23665729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomised clinical trial of Hydrofiber dressing with silver versus povidone-iodine gauze in the management of open surgical and traumatic wounds.
Jurczak F; Dugré T; Johnstone A; Offori T; Vujovic Z; Hollander D;
Int Wound J; 2007 Mar; 4(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 17425549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.
Souliotis K; Kalemikerakis I; Saridi M; Papageorgiou M; Kalokerinou A
Wound Repair Regen; 2016 May; 24(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 27037729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation comparing the efficacy of aquacel ag hydrofiber dressing versus petrolatum gauze with antibiotic ointment in partial-thickness burns in a pediatric burn center.
Saba SC; Tsai R; Glat P
J Burn Care Res; 2009; 30(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19349897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?
Albert NM; Rock R; Sammon MA; Bena JF; Morrison SL; Whitman A; Kato I; Landis-Erdman JC
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 22552107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.
Vermeulen H; Ubbink D; Goossens A; de Vos R; Legemate D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(2):CD003554. PubMed ID: 15106207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.
Lewis R; Whiting P; ter Riet G; O'Meara S; Glanville J
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(14):1-131. PubMed ID: 11399237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
