BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15802394)

  • 1. When has an induction failed?
    Simon CE; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 15802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with the length of the latent phase during labor induction.
    Grobman WA; Simon C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jun; 132(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 17010501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duration of labor induction in nulliparous women at term: how long is long enough?
    Blackwell SC; Refuerzo J; Chadha R; Samson J
    Am J Perinatol; 2008 Apr; 25(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 18548392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.
    Nuthalapaty FS; Rouse DJ; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 14990405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unengaged vertex in nulliparous women in active labor. A risk factor for cesarean delivery.
    Falzone S; Chauhan SP; Mobley JA; Berg TG; Sherline DM; Devoe LD
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Aug; 43(8):676-80. PubMed ID: 9749418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.
    Foley ME; Alarab M; Daly L; Keane D; Rath A; O'herlihy C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 15467560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced?
    Kim LH; Cheng YW; Delaney S; Jelin AC; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 May; 23(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 19951010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of induced labor in 931 term pregnancies.
    Orhue AA; Unuigbe JA; Ezimokhai M; Ojo VA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jul; 64(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 6738933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.
    Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 16880297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
    Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Laros RK; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):585.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17547906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
    Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase.
    Chelmow D; Kilpatrick SJ; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 8459953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.
    Gelisen O; Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Ozdas E; Dilbaz B; Ozdas E; Haberal A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15925045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction.
    Roos N; Sahlin L; Ekman-Ordeberg G; Kieler H; Stephansson O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1003-10. PubMed ID: 20636240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor.
    Bailit JL; Dierker L; Blanchard MH; Mercer BM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 105(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 15625145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.