259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15802401)
1. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate.
Meikle SF; Steiner CA; Zhang J; Lawrence WL
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):751-6. PubMed ID: 15802401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004.
Gossman GL; Joesch JM; Tanfer K
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 108(6):1506-16. PubMed ID: 17138787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?
Gregory KD; Henry OA; Gellens AJ; Hobel CJ; Platt LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 8090395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.
Bloom SL; Leveno KJ; Spong CY; Gilbert S; Hauth JC; Landon MB; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 16816049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.
Landon MB; Spong CY; Thom E; Hauth JC; Bloom SL; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16816050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.
Wu JM; Hundley AF; Visco AG
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 15684156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.
Menacker F; Declercq E; Macdorman MF
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):235-41. PubMed ID: 17011392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy.
Whiteman MK; Kuklina E; Hillis SD; Jamieson DJ; Meikle SF; Posner SF; Marchbanks PA
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 108(6):1486-92. PubMed ID: 17138784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
Linton A; Peterson MR
Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.
Robson SJ; Tan WS; Adeyemi A; Dear KB
Birth; 2009 Sep; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19747267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing rates of cesarean delivery: the Duke experience, 1978-1986.
Hage ML; Helms MJ; Hammond WE; Hammond CB
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 72(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 3380513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for cesarean delivery in developing countries.
Stanton C; Ronsmans C;
Birth; 2008 Sep; 35(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 18844646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation.
Varner MW; Leindecker S; Spong CY; Moawad AH; Hauth JC; Landon MB; Leveno KJ; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman A; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 193(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 16021071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries.
Ford AA; Bateman BT; Simpson LL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 195(4):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17000246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
