These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1580246)

  • 1. Random digit dialing in Chicago CARDIA: comparison of individuals with unlisted and listed telephone numbers.
    Orden SR; Dyer AR; Liu K; Perkins L; Ruth KJ; Burke G; Manolio TA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Mar; 135(6):697-709. PubMed ID: 1580246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recruiting young adults in an urban setting: the Chicago CARDIA experience.
    Orden SR; Dyer AR; Liu K
    Am J Prev Med; 1990; 6(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 2204367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random digit dialing: the potential effect on sample characteristics of the conversion of nonresidential telephone numbers.
    Voigt LF; Davis S; Heuser L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Dec; 136(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 1488966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a difference in health estimates between people with listed and unlisted telephone numbers?
    Dal Grande E; Taylor A; Wilson D
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Oct; 29(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 16255447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of bias and logistics in a survey of adults at increased risk for oral health decrements.
    Gilbert GH; Duncan RP; Kulley AM; Coward RT; Heft MW
    J Public Health Dent; 1997; 57(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 9150063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recruitment in the Coronary Artery Disease Risk Development in Young Adults (Cardia) Study.
    Hughes GH; Cutter G; Donahue R; Friedman GD; Hulley S; Hunkeler E; Jacobs DR; Liu K; Orden S; Pirie P
    Control Clin Trials; 1987 Dec; 8(4 Suppl):68S-73S. PubMed ID: 3440391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Differences between listed and unlisted telephone subscribers among telephone survey respondents].
    Kigawa M; Nishikawa H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Apr; 45(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 9691661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates.
    Wilson DH; Starr GJ; Taylor AW; Dal Grande E
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Dec; 23(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 10641355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of geographic clustering of population samples selected using different methods of random digit dialing.
    Davis S; Ross A; Voigt LF; Heuser L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jul; 132(1 Suppl):S144-55. PubMed ID: 2356827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies.
    Olson SH; Kelsey JL; Pearson TA; Levin B
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Jan; 135(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 1536136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.
    Friedman GD; Cutter GR; Donahue RP; Hughes GH; Hulley SB; Jacobs DR; Liu K; Savage PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1988; 41(11):1105-16. PubMed ID: 3204420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of random digit dialing calls to enumerate an adult female population.
    Glaser SL; Stearns CB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2002 May; 155(10):972-5. PubMed ID: 11994238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The contribution of sociodemographic, medical, and attitudinal factors to blood donation among the general public.
    Boulware LE; Ratner LE; Ness PM; Cooper LA; Campbell-Lee S; LaVeist TA; Powe NR
    Transfusion; 2002 Jun; 42(6):669-78. PubMed ID: 12147017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of telephone sampling and area sampling: response rates and within-household coverage.
    Brogan DJ; Denniston MM; Liff JM; Flagg EW; Coates RJ; Brinton LA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jun; 153(11):1119-27. PubMed ID: 11390332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of random digit dialing in selecting matched controls for a case-control study of pediatric cancer.
    Ward EM; Kramer S; Meadows AT
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Oct; 120(4):582-91. PubMed ID: 6475927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The experience of using random digit dialling methods in a population-based chronic pain study.
    Blyth FM; March LM; Shellard D; Cousins MJ
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002 Dec; 26(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 12530793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Education, 15-year risk factor progression, and coronary artery calcium in young adulthood and early middle age: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study.
    Yan LL; Liu K; Daviglus ML; Colangelo LA; Kiefe CI; Sidney S; Matthews KA; Greenland P
    JAMA; 2006 Apr; 295(15):1793-800. PubMed ID: 16622141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random digit dialing for control selection. A review and a caution on its use in studies of childhood cancer.
    Greenberg ER
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jan; 131(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2403464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the feasibility and sample quality of a national random-digit dialing cellular phone survey of young adults.
    Gundersen DA; ZuWallack RS; Dayton J; Echeverría SE; Delnevo CD
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 179(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 24100957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conducting regional health surveys using a computer-assisted telephone interviewing method.
    Watson EK; Firman DW; Heywood A; Hauquitz AC; Ring I
    Aust J Public Health; 1995 Oct; 19(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 8713202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.