486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15802584)
1. NIH response to open letter.
Fauci AS; Zerhouni EA
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5718):49. PubMed ID: 15802584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An open letter to Elias Zerhouni.
Altman S; Bassler BL; Beckwith J; Belfort M; Berg HC; Bloom B; Brenchley JE; Campbell A; Collier RJ; Connell N; Cozzarelli NR; Craig NL; Darst S; Ebright RH; Elledge SJ; Falkow S; Galan JE; Gottesman M; Gourse R; Grindley ND; Gross CA; Grossman A; Hochschild A; Howe M; Hurwitz J; Isberg RR; Kaplan S; Kornberg A; Kustu SG; Landick RC; Landy A; Levy SB; Losick R; Long SR; Maloy SR; Mekalanos JJ; Neidhardt FC; Pace NR; Ptashne M; Roberts JW; Roth JR; Rothman-Denes LB; Salyers A; Schaechter M; Shapiro L; Silhavy TJ; Simon MI; Walker G; Yanofsky C; Zinder N
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1409-10. PubMed ID: 15746409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Microbiology. Détente declared on NIH biodefense funding.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 May; 308(5724):938. PubMed ID: 15890854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biodefense. Has biodefense gone overboard?
Enserink M; Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1396-8. PubMed ID: 15746402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.
Couzin J
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. On incentives for innovation.
Alberts B
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
Zerhouni EA
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
Miller G; Couzin J
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. U.S. budget 2009. NIH hopes for more mileage from roadmap.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):716. PubMed ID: 18258872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biologists disappointed as NIH budget falls flat.
Check E
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6943):905. PubMed ID: 12827154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 2004 budget request. NIH shuffles budget to prop up research.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5608):807. PubMed ID: 12574595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH funding reform.
Strauss JF
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.
Loscalzo J
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1665-7. PubMed ID: 16625006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
