132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15802918)
1. A note on linkage analysis with affected sib triplets.
Knapp M
Hum Hered; 2005; 59(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 15802918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 2: Relationship between affected sib-pair tests and lod score analysis.
Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8163291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
Thomson G; Motro U
Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exact elods and exact power for affected sib pairs analyzed for linkage under simple right and wrong models.
Hodge SE
Am J Med Genet; 1998 Feb; 81(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 9514591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
Guo X; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel polylocus method for linkage analysis using the lod-score or affected sib-pair method.
Terwilliger JD; Ott J
Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 8314047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. On the total expected study cost in two-stage genome-wide search designs for linkage analysis using the mean test for affected sib pairs.
Ziegler A; Böddeker I; Geller F; Müller HH; Guo X
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 11255247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Note on linkage analysis when the mode of transmission is unknown.
Neuman RJ; Rice JP
Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):349-58. PubMed ID: 2253869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative variation in sets of triplets and quadruplets: a simulation.
Allen G
Hum Biol; 1995 Apr; 67(2):251-63. PubMed ID: 7729827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integration of linkage analyses and disease association studies.
Nemesure BB; He Q; Mendell N
Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 8787989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inferring mode of inheritance by comparison of lod scores.
Greenberg DA
Am J Med Genet; 1989 Dec; 34(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 2624256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Multifactorial diseases: a nightmare for the geneticist].
Feingold J
Med Sci (Paris); 2005 Nov; 21(11):927-33. PubMed ID: 16274643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using family history information to distinguish true and false positive model-free linkage results.
Olson JM; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 9554555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
Kendler KS
Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the effect of multiple linkage tests in complex diseases.
Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bonaïti-Pellié C
Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(4):245-53. PubMed ID: 2227371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Affected kin-pair IBD methods: genetic models.
Motro U; Thomson G
Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(5):317-27. PubMed ID: 1761204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
