These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15803124)

  • 1. Missed opportunity to ban reproductive cloning.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2005 Apr; 7(4):323. PubMed ID: 15803124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should a ban on reproductive cloning include a ban on cloning for purposes of research or therapy?
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 2001-2002; 32(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 12645553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnant pause: governments should ban reproductive cloning but allow the therapeutic sort.
    Economist; 2004 Jan; 370(8359):13-4. PubMed ID: 15058296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. House backs ban on human cloning for any objective.
    Stolberg SG
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 12154827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Australia lifts ban on cloning.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7121):799. PubMed ID: 17167441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A constitutional analysis of the proposed ban on non-reproductive human cloning: an unjustified violation of freedom of expression?
    Billingsley B
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 15739315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Researchers divided over ethics of a ban on cloning.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6938):373. PubMed ID: 12761514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What's in a name? "Nuclear transplantation" and the ethics of stem cell research.
    McLean MR
    Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1017-34. PubMed ID: 15508213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dividing the cloning divide.
    Nat Genet; 2004 Sep; 36(9):913. PubMed ID: 15340419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recommended response for human cloning patent applications.
    Nash D
    IDEA J Law Technol; 2002; 42(2):279-312. PubMed ID: 15732181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Britain grants license to make human embryos for stem cells.
    Timmons H
    N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A4. PubMed ID: 15540360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research cloning gets green light from Japanese ethicists.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6995):5. PubMed ID: 15229568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ban stand: cloning's big test.
    Kass LR; Callahan D
    New Repub; 2001 Aug; 225(6):10, 12. PubMed ID: 12425315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cloning name games: therapeutic cloning is still cloning.
    O'Mathuna DP
    Todays Christ Dr; 2002; 33(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 12599383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cloning in America: the Genetics and Public Policy Center surveys the nation.
    Burton KW
    Genewatch; 2005; 18(6):13-8. PubMed ID: 16459409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The United Nations and human cloning: a debate on hold.
    Walters L
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 15852523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Australia stops short of a ban on therapeutic cloning.
    Nowak R
    New Sci; 2001 Sep; 171(2310):11. PubMed ID: 11838486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Japan's cloning ban will allow stem cell experiments.
    Triendl R
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6776):321. PubMed ID: 10766599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A vote to ban cloning of human embryos.
    Fay W
    Origins; 2001 Aug; 31(11):198-9. PubMed ID: 11838492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term.
    Cohen E
    New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.