These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15804445)

  • 1. A neuromagnetic analysis of the mechanism for generating auditory evoked fields.
    Hamada T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 May; 56(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 15804445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model for the mechanism of generating the auditory evoked field.
    Hamada T
    Biol Cybern; 2006 Feb; 94(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 16292561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm).
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):256-61. PubMed ID: 15953534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of center frequency and bandwidth on the auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Matsuoka K
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):64-71. PubMed ID: 16797895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
    Ross B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuromagnetic responses to binaural beat in human cerebral cortex.
    Karino S; Yumoto M; Itoh K; Uno A; Yamakawa K; Sekimoto S; Kaga K
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 96(4):1927-38. PubMed ID: 16790592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
    Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing.
    Tavabi K; Obleser J; Dobel C; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3155-62. PubMed ID: 17561829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetoencephalography for research of auditory cortex.
    Poch-Broto J; Bhathal B; Iglesias MC; Santiuste M; Fernández A; Ortiz T; Gil-Loyzaga P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 May; 128(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 18421609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuromagnetic responses in silence after musical chord sequences.
    Otsuka A; Tamaki Y; Kuriki S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(16):1637-41. PubMed ID: 18815583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory cortex responses to the transition from monophonic to pseudo-stereo sound.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Wollbrink A; Pantev C
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():18. PubMed ID: 16012692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
    Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
    Hsiao FJ; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.