1376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15804466)
1. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.
Meeuwis C; Peters NH; Mali WP; Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Schipper ME; van den Bosch MA
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 17218074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Freehand MRI-guided preoperative needle localization of breast lesions after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy without marker placement.
van de Ven SM; Lin MC; Daniel BL; Sareen P; Lipson JA; Pal S; Dirbas FM; Ikeda DM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 20575077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma.
Schouten van der Velden AP; Boetes C; Bult P; Wobbes T
Am J Surg; 2006 Aug; 192(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16860625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis.
Boyages J; Delaney G; Taylor R
Cancer; 1999 Feb; 85(3):616-28. PubMed ID: 10091735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
Schelfout K; Van Goethem M; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Schelfhout AM; Leyman P; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Den Haute J; Gillardin JP; Tjalma W; Van Der Auwera JC; Buytaert P; De Schepper A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of local recurrence following excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Hetelekidis S; Collins L; Silver B; Manola J; Gelman R; Cooper A; Lester S; Lyons JA; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
Cancer; 1999 Jan; 85(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 10023711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up.
Di Saverio S; Catena F; Santini D; Ansaloni L; Fogacci T; Mignani S; Leone A; Gazzotti F; Gagliardi S; De Cataldis A; Taffurelli M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jun; 109(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 17687650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with close or focally involved margins following breast-conserving surgery: treatment with reexcision or radiotherapy with increased dosage.
Monteau A; Sigal-Zafrani B; Kirova YM; Fourchotte V; Bollet MA; Vincent-Salomon A; Asselain B; Salmon RJ; Fourquet A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 19386441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
