These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15804500)

  • 1. Auditory compensation in myopic humans: involvement of binaural, monaural, or echo cues?
    Després O; Candas V; Dufour A
    Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 1041(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 15804500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial auditory compensation in early-blind humans: involvement of eye movements and/or attention orienting?
    Després O; Candas V; Dufour A
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1955-62. PubMed ID: 16168735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced self-localization by auditory cues in blind humans.
    Després O; Boudard D; Candas V; Dufour A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jul; 27(13):753-9. PubMed ID: 16096227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High binaural coherence determines successful sound localization and increased activity in posterior auditory areas.
    Zimmer U; Macaluso E
    Neuron; 2005 Sep; 47(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16157283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The extent of visual deficit and auditory spatial compensation: evidence from self-positioning from auditory cues.
    Després O; Candas V; Dufour A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):444-7. PubMed ID: 15820651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound localization under perturbed binaural hearing.
    Van Wanrooij MM; Van Opstal AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 97(1):715-26. PubMed ID: 17065242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic cues underlying auditory distance in barn owls.
    Kim DO; Moiseff A; Turner JB; Gull J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 18368570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision.
    Zwiers MP; Van Opstal AJ; Paige GD
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 6(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 12524547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blind subjects process auditory spectral cues more efficiently than sighted individuals.
    Doucet ME; Guillemot JP; Lassonde M; Gagné JP; Leclerc C; Lepore F
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 15309355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reorganisation of the right occipito-parietal stream for auditory spatial processing in early blind humans. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Collignon O; Davare M; Olivier E; De Volder AG
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):232-40. PubMed ID: 19199020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans.
    Tardif E; Murray MM; Meylan R; Spierer L; Clarke S
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):161-76. PubMed ID: 16684510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials for interaural time differences and spectral cues.
    Hautus MJ; Johnson BW; Colling LJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):951-6. PubMed ID: 19430320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaural timing cues do not contribute to the map of space in the ferret superior colliculus: a virtual acoustic space study.
    Campbell RA; Doubell TP; Nodal FR; Schnupp JW; King AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):242-54. PubMed ID: 16162823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ventriloquism aftereffects occur in the rear hemisphere.
    Sarlat L; Warusfel O; Viaud-Delmon I
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Sep; 404(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 16806699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
    Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
    Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects.
    Lessard N; Paré M; Lepore F; Lassonde M
    Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6699):278-80. PubMed ID: 9751055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans.
    Röder B; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Sterr A; Rösler F; Hillyard SA; Neville HJ
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):162-6. PubMed ID: 10408442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blind people are more sensitive than sighted people to binaural sound-location cues, particularly inter-aural level differences.
    Nilsson ME; Schenkman BN
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():223-232. PubMed ID: 26433052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic factors govern developmental sharpening of spatial tuning in the auditory cortex.
    Mrsic-Flogel TD; Schnupp JW; King AJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 6(9):981-8. PubMed ID: 12910241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.