90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15804813)
1. Predictability and prediction of lowest observed adverse effect levels in a structurally heterogeneous set of chemicals.
de Julián-Ortiz JV; García-Domenech R; Gálvez J; Pogliani L
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2005 Jun; 16(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 15804813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
Kavlock R; Dix D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a QSAR model for acute toxicity.
Pavan M; Netzeva TI; Worth AP
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 16644555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. True prediction of lowest observed adverse effect levels.
García-Domenech R; de Julián-Ortiz JV; Besalú E
Mol Divers; 2006 May; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 16721628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QSTR with extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices. 12. QSAR for the toxicity of diverse aromatic compounds to Tetrahymena pyriformis using chemometric tools.
Roy K; Ghosh G
Chemosphere; 2009 Nov; 77(7):999-1009. PubMed ID: 19709717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the oral rat chronic lowest observed adverse effect level model in TOPKAT, a QSAR software package for toxicity prediction.
Venkatapathy R; Moudgal CJ; Bruce RM
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1623-9. PubMed ID: 15446819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Description of the electronic structure of organic chemicals using semiempirical and ab initio methods for development of toxicological QSARs.
Netzeva TI; Aptula AO; Benfenati E; Cronin MT; Gini G; Lessigiarska I; Maran U; Vracko M; Schüürmann G
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 15667135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistically validated QSARs, based on theoretical descriptors, for modeling aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals in Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow).
Papa E; Villa F; Gramatica P
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16180902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of fathead minnow acute toxicity of organic compounds from molecular structure.
Eldred DV; Weikel CL; Jurs PC; Kaiser KL
Chem Res Toxicol; 1999 Jul; 12(7):670-8. PubMed ID: 10409408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QSTR with extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices. 9. Comparative QSAR for the toxicity of diverse functional organic compounds to Chlorella vulgaris using chemometric tools.
Roy K; Ghosh G
Chemosphere; 2007 Nov; 70(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17765287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A segmented principal component analysis-regression approach to quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling.
Hemmateenejad B; Elyasi M
Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Jul; 646(1-2):30-8. PubMed ID: 19523553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QSAR modeling of toxicity of diverse organic chemicals to Daphnia magna using 2D and 3D descriptors.
Kar S; Roy K
J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):344-51. PubMed ID: 20045248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic oral LOAEL prediction by using a commercially available computational QSAR tool.
Rupp B; Appel KE; Gundert-Remy U
Arch Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 84(9):681-8. PubMed ID: 20224925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of effect levels of chemicals from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. I. Chronic lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL).
Mumtaz MM; Knauf LA; Reisman DJ; Peirano WB; DeRosa CT; Gombar VK; Enslein K; Carter JR; Blake BW; Huque KI
Toxicol Lett; 1995 Sep; 79(1-3):131-43. PubMed ID: 7570650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linear QSAR regression models for the prediction of bioconcentration factors by physicochemical properties and structural theoretical molecular descriptors.
Papa E; Dearden JC; Gramatica P
Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 17109926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of acute toxicity to mice by the Arithmetic Mean Toxicity (AMT) modelling approach.
Raevsky OA; Grigor'ev VJ; Modina EA; Worth AP
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):265-75. PubMed ID: 20544551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling of Gibbs energy of formation of organic compounds by linear and nonlinear methods.
Yan A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2299-304. PubMed ID: 17125172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for prediction of sensory irritants (logRD50) of volatile organic chemicals.
Luan F; Ma W; Zhang X; Zhang H; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan BT
Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(7):1142-53. PubMed ID: 16307788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TOMOCOMD-CARDD descriptors-based virtual screening of tyrosinase inhibitors: evaluation of different classification model combinations using bond-based linear indices.
Casañola-Martín GM; Marrero-Ponce Y; Khan MT; Ather A; Sultan S; Torrens F; Rotondo R
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Feb; 15(3):1483-503. PubMed ID: 17110117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
