These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15804846)
1. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types. Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females. Wu SP Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine? Lavender SA; Li YC; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19308820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding. van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revised NIOSH equation for manual lifting: a method for job evaluation. Garg A AAOHN J; 1995 Apr; 43(4):211-6; quiz 217-8. PubMed ID: 7772206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting. Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When is it safe to manually lift a patient? Waters TR Am J Nurs; 2007 Aug; 107(8):53-8; quiz 59. PubMed ID: 17667392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders. Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation. Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion. Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychophysical determination of load carrying capacity for a 1-h work period by Chinese males. Wu SP; Chen CC Ergonomics; 2001 Sep; 44(11):1008-23. PubMed ID: 11693245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects. Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NIOSH equation horizontal distances associated with the Liberty Mutual (Snook) lifting table box widths. Potvin JR; Bent LR Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 9174416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles. Davis KG; Marras WS; Waters TR Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1155-68. PubMed ID: 9715674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Waters TR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Workload assessment in building construction related activities in India. Maiti R Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):754-65. PubMed ID: 18206852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]