283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15805951)
1. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty.
Haaker RG; Stockheim M; Kamp M; Proff G; Breitenfelder J; Ottersbach A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Apr; (433):152-9. PubMed ID: 15805951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jun; 99(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28632587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-Term Results of Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasties Performed by Low-Volume and Less Experienced Surgeon].
Lacko M; Schreierová D; Čellár R; Vaško G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(3):219-225. PubMed ID: 30257783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Choi Y; Kwon OR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 91(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19122074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity.
Hernández-Vaquero D; Suarez-Vazquez A; Sandoval-Garcia MA; Noriega-Fernandez A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 May; 468(5):1237-41. PubMed ID: 19937166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases.
Zorman D; Etuin P; Jennart H; Scipioni D; Devos S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2005 Dec; 71(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 16459860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study.
Todesca A; Garro L; Penna M; Bejui-Hugues J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jun; 25(6):1778-1783. PubMed ID: 27306985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of 447 SCORE® highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties after 5-10 years follow-up.
Châtain F; Gaillard TH; Denjean S; Tayot O
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 99(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 23988419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome.
Hasegawa M; Yoshida K; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Jun; 19(6):904-10. PubMed ID: 20811732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femur bowing could be a risk factor for implant flexion in conventional total knee arthroplasty and notching in navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Ko JH; Han CD; Shin KH; Nguku L; Yang IH; Lee WS; Kim KI; Park KK
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2476-82. PubMed ID: 26581366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted stereotaxic navigation improves the accuracy of mechanical alignment and component positioning in total knee arthroplasty.
Liow MH; Goh GS; Pang HN; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1173-80. PubMed ID: 27349233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty improve the overall component position and patient function?
Allen CL; Hooper GJ; Oram BJ; Wells JE
Int Orthop; 2014 Feb; 38(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 23842630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience.
Bolognesi M; Hofmann A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Nov; 440():162-9. PubMed ID: 16239801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of navigation to achieve soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty - a randomised clinical study.
Joseph J; Simpson PM; Whitehouse SL; English HW; Donnelly WJ
Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 23891167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
