BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807013)

  • 1. Investigation of potential effects of cellular phones on human auditory function by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Janssen T; Boege P; von Mikusch-Buchberg J; Raczek J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1241-7. PubMed ID: 15807013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence on the mechanisms of generation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions of mobile phone exposure.
    Parazzini M; Bell S; Thuroczy G; Molnar F; Tognola G; Lutman ME; Ravazzani P
    Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 208(1-2):68-78. PubMed ID: 16054312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of intrauterine and extrauterine exposure to GSM-like radiofrequency on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in infant male rabbits.
    Budak GG; Muluk NB; Budak B; Oztürk GG; Apan A; Seyhan N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 73(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 19108901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
    Budak B; Budak GG; Oztürk GG; Muluk NB; Apan A; Seyhan N
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Jun; 36(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 18606507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of GSM-like radiofrequency on distortion product otoacoustic emissions of rabbits: comparison of infants versus adults.
    Budak GG; Muluk NB; Budak B; Oztürk GG; Apan A; Seyhan N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Aug; 73(8):1143-7. PubMed ID: 19477533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of potential effects of the electromagnetic fields of mobile phones on hearing.
    Uloziene I; Uloza V; Gradauskiene E; Saferis V
    BMC Public Health; 2005 Apr; 5():39. PubMed ID: 15840162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the short-term exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic field originating from mobile phone affect auditory functions as measured by Acoustic Admittance and Evoked Otoacoustic Emission tests?
    Kacprzyk A; Kocoń S; Składzień J; Rokita E; Pawlak R; Kwiecień J; Tatoń G
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2020 Oct; 39(4):411-418. PubMed ID: 32993394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short GSM mobile phone exposure does not alter human auditory brainstem response.
    Stefanics G; Kellényi L; Molnár F; Kubinyi G; Thuróczy G; Hernádi I
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Nov; 7():325. PubMed ID: 17997856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of GSM-like radiofrequency on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in pregnant adult rabbits.
    Budak GG; Muluk NB; Oztürk GG; Budak B; Apan A; Seyhan N; Sanli C
    Clin Invest Med; 2009 Apr; 32(2):E112-6. PubMed ID: 19331799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Negative Middle Ear Pressure and Composite and Component Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Thompson S; Henin S; Long GR
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 26049553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic fields exposure on cochlear cells' functionality in rats: evaluation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Galloni P; Lovisolo GA; Mancini S; Parazzini M; Pinto R; Piscitelli M; Ravazzani P; Marino C
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Oct; 26(7):536-47. PubMed ID: 16037958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiologic disturbances in long-term mobile phone users.
    Panda NK; Jain R; Bakshi J; Munjal S
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 20122338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of chronic exposure of electromagnetic fields from mobile phones on hearing in rats.
    Kizilay A; Ozturan O; Erdem T; Kalcioglu MT; Miman MC
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2003 Aug; 30(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 12927285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.