These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807214)

  • 1. To publish or not to publish--that is the question.
    Gleicher N
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2005 Jan; 22(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15807214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publish and perish in the hands of predatory journals.
    Cordeiro Y; Lima LMTR
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2017; 89(2):787-788. PubMed ID: 28640338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual dual-use research of concern: publish and perish?
    Satyanarayana K
    Indian J Med Res; 2011 Jan; 133(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21321412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publish? Perish the thought!
    Burris JF
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1989 Nov; 46(5):598-9. PubMed ID: 2582713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medwave’s editorial history, policies and guidelines: 3. Section policies.
    Bachelet VC
    Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6910. PubMed ID: 28430764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pattern of publishing previously rejected articles in selected journals.
    Whitman N; Eyre S
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3843082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does editorial peer review work?
    Lock S
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jul; 121(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 8198351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. WASP: Is open access publishing the way forward? A review of the different ways in which research papers can be published.
    Cuschieri S
    Early Hum Dev; 2018 Jun; 121():54-57. PubMed ID: 29499986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Art of Peer Review.
    Fraser D
    Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predatory Publishing: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You.
    Nolfi DA; Lockhart JS; Myers CR
    Nurse Educ; 2015; 40(5):217-9. PubMed ID: 25997152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals.
    Glover D
    J Wound Care; 2006 Feb; 15(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 16521599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
    Beall J
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What to publish?
    Nat Cell Biol; 2008 Mar; 10(3):247. PubMed ID: 18311175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.