These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807363)

  • 1. What conditions justify risky nontherapeutic or "no benefit" pediatric studies: a sliding scale analysis.
    Kopelman LM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(4):749-58. PubMed ID: 15807363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why we need legal standards for pediatric research.
    Wendler D; Forster H
    J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 14760251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pediatric research and the federal minimal risk standard.
    Ross LF; Nelson RM
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(7):759; author reply 759-60. PubMed ID: 16478898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomedical ethics, public-health risk assessment, and the naturalistic fallacy.
    Elliott K
    Public Aff Q; 2002 Oct; 16(4):351-76. PubMed ID: 12705236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moral responsiveness in pediatric research ethics.
    Moeller CJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W1-W3. PubMed ID: 14744302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Author response to letter regarding "Children in clinical research: a conflict of moral values" (AJOB 3:1).
    Sharav VH
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing pesticides in humans: of mice and men divided by ten.
    Krimsky S; Simoncelli T
    JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(21):2405-7. PubMed ID: 17551133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pediatric research: what is broken and what needs to be fixed?
    Lantos JD
    J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 14760250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-beneficial pediatric research and the best interests standard: a legal and ethical reconciliation.
    Litton P
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2008; 8(2):359-420. PubMed ID: 19049018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research.
    Rubinstein E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk standards for pediatric research: rethinking the Grimes ruling.
    Wendler D
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2004 Jun; 14(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 15281189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical studies and the average American kid.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A5. PubMed ID: 16138447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.
    Kopelman LM
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):177-92. PubMed ID: 12816126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panel suggests using inmates in drug trials.
    Urbina I
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Aug; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 16918009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nontherapeutic research with children: the virtues and vices of legal uncertainty.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 2002-2003; 33(3):621-45. PubMed ID: 15378825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethically questionable research with children: the Kennedy Krieger Lead Abatement Study.
    Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):167-75. PubMed ID: 12816125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioterrorism, biodefense, and biotechnology in the military: a comparative analysis of legal and ethical issues in the research, development, and use of biotechnological products on American and British soldiers.
    Melson AR
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2004; 14(2):E1-E44. PubMed ID: 16521317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.
    Wendler D; Belsky L; Thompson KM; Emanuel EJ
    JAMA; 2005 Aug; 294(7):826-32. PubMed ID: 16106008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children as subjects in nontherapeutic research. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Pearce M
    J Leg Med; 2002 Sep; 23(3):421-36. PubMed ID: 12230814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.