135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807637)
1. How long will automated perimetry remain standard practice?
Gutteridge IF
Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Mar; 88(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 15807637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of confrontation visual field tests.
Prasad S; Cohen AB
Neurology; 2011 Mar; 76(13):1192-3; author reply 1193. PubMed ID: 21444908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A traffic perimetry test that adheres to the European visual field requirements for group 2 drivers.
Jørstad ØK; Jonsdottir TE; Zysset S; Rowe FJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 99(7):e1253-e1254. PubMed ID: 33421353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated perimetry. How do we interpret the results?
Wilensky JT
Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 107(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 2916969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR;
Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression.
Artes PH; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Alward WL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 10755955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent developments in perimetry: test stimuli and procedures.
McKendrick AM
Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Mar; 88(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15807638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
Frisén L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic value of automated flicker threshold perimetry.
Rota-Bartelink A
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1999 Apr; 10(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 10537764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma.
Nouri-Mahdavi K
Can J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 25433738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 2. Results from a population with induced visual field defects.
Henson DB; Dix SM
Br J Ophthalmol; 1984 Jul; 68(7):463-7. PubMed ID: 6733070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.
Keltner JL; Johnson CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 7710398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors that influence automated perimetry.
Fingeret M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7018. PubMed ID: 23047719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
