These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807637)

  • 21. Field of dreamers and dreamed-up fields: functional and fake perimetry.
    Thompson JC; Kosmorsky GS; Ellis BD
    Ophthalmology; 1996 Jan; 103(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 8628542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Supervision during automated perimetry.
    Sisto D
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Aug; 107(8):1438-9. PubMed ID: 10919881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comments on automated perimetry papers.
    Keltner JL
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1317-9. PubMed ID: 233863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture. Early losses of visual function in glaucoma.
    Johnson CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 72(6):359-70. PubMed ID: 7566898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?
    O'Brien C; Wild JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Mar; 79(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 7703193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Glaucoma is present prior to its detection with standard automated perimetry: is it time to change our concepts?
    Sample PA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 241(3):168-9. PubMed ID: 12722769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Supervision during automated perimetry.
    Johnson LN; Sassani JW; Aminlari A
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Aug; 107(8):1439-40. PubMed ID: 10919883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pupil perimetry.
    Kardon RH
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1992 Oct; 3(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 10147922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Signal/noise ratios to compare tests for measuring visual field progression.
    Ernest PJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6893; author reply 6893-4. PubMed ID: 21123778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vigabatrin-associated loss of vision: rarebit perimetry illuminates the dose-damage relationship.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Feb; 82(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 14738486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-pass resolution perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Clinical impressions.
    Lindblom B; Hoyt WF
    Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 1594214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oculokinetic perimetry for the assessment of visual fields.
    Clark BJ; Timms C; Franks WA
    Arch Dis Child; 1990 Apr; 65(4):432-4. PubMed ID: 2346336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency doubling perimetry in patients with mild and moderate pituitary tumor-associated visual field defects detected by conventional perimetry.
    Monteiro ML; Moura FC; Cunha LP
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 17589707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
    Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated visual field plotters vs tangent screen kinetic perimetry.
    Gerber DS; Brothers DM; Erickson RC; Sprotzer SP; Farrell G
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 May; 98(5):930-2. PubMed ID: 7378015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examination of the peripheral visual field. Obligatory, helpful, or a waste of resources?
    Wirtschafter JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Jun; 105(6):761-2. PubMed ID: 3579704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kamantigue ME; Joson PJ; Chen PP
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16378016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.