These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807638)

  • 1. Recent developments in perimetry: test stimuli and procedures.
    McKendrick AM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Mar; 88(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15807638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR;
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent developments in automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis and management.
    Johnson CA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2002 Apr; 13(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 11880719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic value of automated flicker threshold perimetry.
    Rota-Bartelink A
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1999 Apr; 10(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 10537764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
    Singh MD; Jain K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry.
    Han S; Baek SH; Kim US
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(5):647-650. PubMed ID: 27404791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.
    Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A; Aspinall P; Taguri A; King AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 133(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 11860968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation.
    Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):4787-95. PubMed ID: 14578400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
    Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current practice with standard automated perimetry.
    Bosworth CF; Sample PA; Johnson CA; Weinreb RN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 15(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17585432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Bengtsson B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of terminating Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) with dynamic criteria for white-on-white perimetry.
    McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):981-7. PubMed ID: 16317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conventional perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology, and visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Corallo G; Cicinelli S; Papadia M; Bandini F; Uccelli A; Calabria G
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 16329058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.