These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807638)

  • 21. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry.
    Morales J; Weitzman ML; González de la Rosa M
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jan; 107(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 10647732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vigabatrin-associated loss of vision: rarebit perimetry illuminates the dose-damage relationship.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Feb; 82(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 14738486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perimetry techniques in neuro-ophthalmology.
    Donahue SP
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1999 Dec; 10(6):420-8. PubMed ID: 10662247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Jampel HD; Singh K; Lin SC; Chen TC; Francis BA; Hodapp E; Samples JR; Smith SD
    Ophthalmology; 2011 May; 118(5):986-1002. PubMed ID: 21539982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 25433738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial resolution of the tendency-oriented perimetry algorithm.
    Anderson AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 May; 44(5):1962-8. PubMed ID: 12714630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Random dot motion stimuli are more sensitive than light stimuli for detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension patients.
    Wall M; Jennisch CS
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):550-7. PubMed ID: 10472961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?
    Conway ML; Hosking SL; Zhu H; Cubbidge RP
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. High-pass resolution perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Clinical impressions.
    Lindblom B; Hoyt WF
    Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 1594214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kamantigue ME; Joson PJ; Chen PP
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16378016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma.
    Thomas R; Bhat S; Muliyil JP; Parikh R; George R
    J Glaucoma; 2002 Feb; 11(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 11821689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast for following visual fields in prepubertal idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Stiebel-Kalish H; Lusky M; Yassur Y; Kalish Y; Shuper A; Erlich R; Lubman S; Snir M
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1673-5. PubMed ID: 15350321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation.
    Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 11818373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.