BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807807)

  • 1. Skin irritation due to repetitive application of adhesive tape: the influence of adhesive strength and seasonal variability.
    Tokumura F; Umekage K; Sado M; Otsuka S; Suda S; Taniguchi M; Yamori A; Nakamura A; Kawai J; Oka K
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15807807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes with soft adhesives to human skin and their mechanism.
    Tokumura F; Homma T; Tomiya T; Kobayashi Y; Matsuda T
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 17374065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional differences in adhesive tape stripping of human skin.
    Tokumura F; Yoshiura Y; Homma T; Nukatsuka H
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Aug; 12(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 16827692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skin changes induced by a zinc oxide dressing compared with a hydrocolloid dressing in healthy individuals.
    Nielsen LF; Blume N; Romme T; Samuelsen P; Everland H; Ifversen P; Karlsmark T
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15807813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal.
    Löffler H; Dreher F; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 151(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 15491413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study.
    Breternitz M; Flach M; Prässler J; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 156(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 17223861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional characteristics of the skin surface of children approaching puberty: age and seasonal influences.
    Akutsu N; Ooguri M; Onodera T; Kobayashi Y; Katsuyama M; Kunizawa N; Hirao T; Hosoi J; Masuda Y; Yoshida S; Takahashi M; Tsuchiya T; Tagami H
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2009; 89(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 19197537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized and controlled comparison of gentleness of 2 medical adhesive tapes in healthy human subjects.
    Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Houser TP; Smith GE; Koski NI
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 23202590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of concentration of tackifying agent on adhesive and skin-protective properties of ceramide 2-containing hydrocolloid dressings.
    Kohta M; Iwasaki T
    J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 25543822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of the adhesiveness of medical tapes when wet, dry or following application of Friars' balsam.
    Beringer RM
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Jun; 18(6):520-4. PubMed ID: 18331555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of the relative stratum corneum amount removed by tape stripping.
    Jacobi U; Weigmann HJ; Ulrich J; Sterry W; Lademann J
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15807805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of RNA recovery and gene expression in the epidermis using non-invasive tape stripping.
    Wong R; Tran V; Talwalker S; Benson NR
    J Dermatol Sci; 2006 Nov; 44(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 17014996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of stratum corneum removal by adhesive tape stripping by total protein assay in 96-well microplates.
    Dreher F; Modjtahedi BS; Modjtahedi SP; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 15807806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased stratum corneum serine protease activity in acute eczematous atopic skin.
    Voegeli R; Rawlings AV; Breternitz M; Doppler S; Schreier T; Fluhr JW
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jul; 161(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 19416247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seasonal effects on the nasolabial skin condition.
    De Paepe K; Houben E; Adam R; Hachem JP; Roseeuw D; Rogiers V
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2009; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 18832867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of transepidermal water loss and spectroscopic absorbance to quantify changes of the stratum corneum after tape stripping.
    Weigmann HJ; Ulrich J; Schanzer S; Jacobi U; Schaefer H; Sterry W; Lademann J
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2005; 18(4):180-5. PubMed ID: 15908758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of bilayer and hexagonal H(II) phase lipid films on transepidermal water loss.
    Raney SG; Hope MJ
    Exp Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 15(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 16761957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dermal effects of two methods of adhesive tape application.
    Firlit SC; Diehl EA; Lindenthal B
    Nurs Res; 1966; 15(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 5178192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stratum corneum hydration and flexibility are useful parameters to indicate clinical severity of congenital ichthyosis.
    Tomita Y; Akiyama M; Shimizu H
    Exp Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 14(8):619-24. PubMed ID: 16026584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of soaking and natural moisturizing factor on stratum corneum water-handling properties.
    Visscher MO; Tolia GT; Wickett RR; Hoath SB
    J Cosmet Sci; 2003; 54(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 12858228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.