These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15807813)

  • 1. Skin changes induced by a zinc oxide dressing compared with a hydrocolloid dressing in healthy individuals.
    Nielsen LF; Blume N; Romme T; Samuelsen P; Everland H; Ifversen P; Karlsmark T
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15807813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin irritation due to repetitive application of adhesive tape: the influence of adhesive strength and seasonal variability.
    Tokumura F; Umekage K; Sado M; Otsuka S; Suda S; Taniguchi M; Yamori A; Nakamura A; Kawai J; Oka K
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15807807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes with soft adhesives to human skin and their mechanism.
    Tokumura F; Homma T; Tomiya T; Kobayashi Y; Matsuda T
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 17374065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of adhesive dressing edges on cutaneous irritancy and skin barrier function.
    Dykes PJ
    J Wound Care; 2007 Mar; 16(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 17385583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biophysical effects of repetitive removal of adhesive dressings on peri-ulcer skin.
    Zillmer R; Agren MS; Gottrup F; Karlsmark T
    J Wound Care; 2006 May; 15(5):187-91. PubMed ID: 16711170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin.
    Dykes PJ; Heggie R; Hill SA
    J Wound Care; 2001 Feb; 10(2):7-10. PubMed ID: 12964220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP; Butcher M
    J Wound Care; 2011 Sep; 20(9):412, 414, 416-22. PubMed ID: 22068140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of adhesion of modern wound dressings: a comparative analysis of 56 different wound dressings.
    Klode J; Schöttler L; Stoffels I; Körber A; Schadendorf D; Dissemond J
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2011 Aug; 25(8):933-9. PubMed ID: 21062365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Irritant Factors of Silicone and Hydrocolloid Skin Contact Adhesives Using Trans-Epidermal Water Loss, Protein Stripping, Erythema, and Ease of Removal.
    Dyson E; Sikkink S; Nocita D; Twigg P; Westgate G; Swift T
    ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2024 Jan; 7(1):284-296. PubMed ID: 38150300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peristomal skin disorders in patients with intestinal and urinary ostomies: influence of adhesive forces of various hydrocolloid wafer skin barriers.
    Omura Y; Yamabe M; Anazawa S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2010; 37(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 20436373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the value of silicone and hydrocolloid products in stoma care.
    Berry J; Black P; Smith R; Stuchfield B
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Jul 12-25; 16(13):778, 780, 782 passim. PubMed ID: 17851331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of concentration of tackifying agent on adhesive and skin-protective properties of ceramide 2-containing hydrocolloid dressings.
    Kohta M; Iwasaki T
    J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 25543822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesives for medical application - Peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response.
    Mbithi F; Worsley PR
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106168. PubMed ID: 37847959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses. Part I: skin dressings and solvent removers.
    Kiat-amnuay S; Gettleman L; Khan Z; Goldsmith LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 11005907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of wet-wrap dressing on epidermal barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis.
    Lee JH; Lee SJ; Kim D; Bang D
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Nov; 21(10):1360-8. PubMed ID: 17958842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new methodology for evaluating the damage to the skin barrier caused by repeated application and removal of adhesive dressings.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e366-74. PubMed ID: 22694144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dexpanthenol and zinc oxide ointment with ointment base in the treatment of irritant diaper dermatitis from diarrhea: a multicenter study.
    Wananukul S; Limpongsanuruk W; Singalavanija S; Wisuthsarewong W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89(10):1654-8. PubMed ID: 17128840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of the adhesiveness of medical tapes when wet, dry or following application of Friars' balsam.
    Beringer RM
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Jun; 18(6):520-4. PubMed ID: 18331555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the effects of topical moisturizers on changes in stratum corneum thickness, water gradients and hydration in vivo.
    Crowther JM; Sieg A; Blenkiron P; Marcott C; Matts PJ; Kaczvinsky JR; Rawlings AV
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(3):567-77. PubMed ID: 18616783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of two vehicles for zinc oxide on zinc absorption through intact skin and wounds.
    Agren MS
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1991; 71(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 1675527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.